User talk:KrumpKrumpKrumpKrump
Welcome!
Hello, KrumpKrumpKrumpKrump, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Calmer Waters 05:39, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
December 2009
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on User talk:Elizabeth Bathory. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Timmeh 05:43, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Please refrain from attacking other contributors, as you did with this edit to User talk:Elizabeth Bathory. Continued personal attacks may lead to being blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on the contributor. Thank you. Zhang He (talk) 05:50, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Momo san Gespräch 05:55, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 05:57, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below. -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:47, 21 December 2009 (UTC)March 2010
[edit]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Mike Tyson. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 05:48, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
- I've asked for more opinions on Celebheights.com over at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive_60#Celebheights.com.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 05:50, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 11:59, 8 March 2010 (UTC)- Rather than blocking you again for edit warring, I have reported you at the Edit Warring Noticeboard for independent evaluation.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:06, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
Blocked again
[edit]The complete report of this case is at WP:AN3#User:KrumpKrumpKrumpKrump reported by User:SarekOfVulcan (Result: 1 month). Any admin may lift this block if they are convinced you will follow our policies. There is no reason for optimism thus far. EdJohnston (talk) 03:30, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
Appeal to unblock
[edit]
KrumpKrumpKrumpKrump (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
The source of celebheights.com is reliable, since the editor, Rob, accumulates evidence from other reliable sources. Just look at the height pages, each individual presents tangible evidence. The height page of each celebrity, in this case, Mike Tyson, is constructed with height quotes that Mike Tyson himself stated. He himself stated "He measured himself in 2005 and declared he was a 'pathetic' 5ft 10." I don't know the source of this quote, however you can contact Rob on the website to see its complete credibility. The editor, Rob is very precise with his heights and states quotes from RELIABLE sources. You can ask him. Overall, i find your block very severe since you haven't clearly read the editor summaries of what I am trying to say. Mike Tyson's fighting height is his height on Wikipedia. Hence, his fighting height is 5'10 due to 2005 being his last year of fighting. From Celebheights.com streamed from another reliable source, Mike Tyson "measured himself in 2005 and declared he was a 'pathetic' 5ft 10.". The reliability should be proved by your contact with Rob. Thank you
Decline reason:
You didn't address the reason for your block, the edit warring. The reliability of the source is irrelevant. That you continue to argue it weighs in favor of retaining the block. — Daniel Case (talk) 13:04, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
KrumpKrumpKrumpKrump (talk) 12:43, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
KrumpKrumpKrumpKrump (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
If you actually read my editing summaries. I have been arguing about the reliability of my source. I started the editing war to argue that my source is reliable and not a unreliable source. The editing war started because a bunch of editors thought my source was unreliable just by a quick visit. Yeah, why don't you analyse the "Unreliable" source I posted by actually looking around the site and contacting the editor, Rob, on the site, who can substantiate the reliability of my source. Next time, you all block someone for posting unreliable sources, actually scrutinize what their source actually are and analyze its nature, not just by seeing it as "Oh, it's just some editor posting crap on this source!". My posted source actually has a editor who posts quotes of heights of celebrities from reliable evidence. You can find out, just by contacting him. In sum, the editing war started because i was arguing over Mike Tyson's height from an assumed "unreliable" source, which is utterly false.
Decline reason:
None of that makes you exempt from the rules against edit=warring. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 05:07, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
KrumpKrumpKrumpKrump (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I'm sorry that I have been forceful in my editing war. I should not have started it. I am genuinely regretful and sorry for what I have done on the Mike Tyson article. And I shall never start a editing war but I will discuss it with perspective on the talk page instead. I wish to follow correct procedures. Thank you. Cheers and beers!
Decline reason:
Exactly 3 months ago, you were blocked. Immediately after that block, you were blocked again for the same reason. One week ago, you were blocked for edit warring. Fresh off that block, you're blocked again for edit-warring. We use an escalating system of blocks to protect against disruption - it should take ZERO blocks when the policies are right at the top of this page. However, you understand what an edit war is - you've been blocked for it before. I am not convinced that you understand the seriousness and how much of a bright line issue WP:EW is. It would appear that 30 days might be enough time for you to re-read the policies, understand the seriousness of them, and finally to understand that any further block could likely be your last. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:20, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
KrumpKrumpKrumpKrump (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Well I knew it would come down to this like last time, so I’m just gonna change my IP address and get another account like before. Haha, admins on Wikipedia are so stupid and closeminded. you admins fools, all have the I.Q of a rock. Cheers and beers to y’all! Hope you can catch my account next time, and the next next time! :D
Decline reason:
Super. I presume we're done here. Kuru (talk) 13:22, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.