User talk:Kronikerdelta

Welcome

Hello Kronikerdelta, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of Contents

Department directory

Need help?

Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.
Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article Wizard — a Wizard to help you create articles
The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.
Guide to Wikipedia — A thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia.

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.

Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Kronikerdelta, good luck, and have fun. --Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 23:22, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case against you

FYI. Basket of Puppies 01:43, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Go away, liar. δ_ij

i . b r o k e . i t .

03:57, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- Cirt (talk) 04:37, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Making threats

Making threats is likely to get you blocked indefinitely. Instead, I suggest you can try contacting the Wikimedia Foundation, through WP:OTRS. Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 05:20, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Telling you that I'm going to get other editors involved if you don't fix the problem YOU created is clearly not a threat. Frankly I don't care. I'm going to inform the administration of the school that this foundations representatives (namely you) are acting in bad faith in producing libel about them. It takes 30 seconds to go to the source and then fix the problem. You've spent more time harassing me than it would have taken to fix it in the first place. WHY WON'T YOU ACT IN GOOD FAITH AND READ THE SOURCE? δ_ij

i . b r o k e . i t .

05:23, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This comment appears to violate our policy No Legal Threats, I suggest you immediately retract this one and the similar threat you made on ANI[1], or you will be blocked. Additionally, your uncivil comments to Cirt are totally unwarranted and inappropriate, Cirt did the absolute right thing in protecting the article. I strongly suggest you retract those comments as well, and if you continue that behavior, you will be blocked for that. Dreadstar ☥ 05:30, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not making a legal threat! I have no ground on which to even pursue a legal case against you! I'm telling you that I am going make the schools administrative staff aware of the problem. Libel is libel whether it is on a wiki or not. I will not retract anything because this is completely warranted. You are obviously stating a mistruth. δ_ij

i . b r o k e . i t .

05:35, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've blocked you for violating Wikipedia:No legal threats, per the discussion here and your comment immediately above, contrary to your assertion, your comment "I'm telling you that I am going make the schools administrative staff aware of the problem. Libel is libel whether it is on a wiki or not. " is indeed a clear legal threat. Dreadstar ☥ 05:42, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fuck off δ_ij $i . b r o k e . i t .$ 05:54, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

By the way if you bother to look at my original complain I am 100% vindicated. Neutral editor bothered to look at the source and corrected the problem. δ_ij

i . b r o k e . i t .

06:25, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

RUN CHECKUSER, I AM NOT A SOCK!!! δ_ij

i . b r o k e . i t .

06:32, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That always means they are. Island Monkey ^{talk the talk} 07:31, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Asking to run checkuser proves my guilt? Really? Why don’t you run it and see if facts and not your made up crap proves me guilty. δ_ij $i . b r o k e . i t .$ 05:26, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Socks frequently protest their innocence, although protesting innocence is not automatically evidence of socking. Meanwhile, you might have a chance at reinstatement if you were to retract and renounce anything you've said that looks like a legal threat whether so intended or not. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 06:19, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]