User talk:Kronecker

Welcome!

Hello Kronecker, and Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.
Here are some good places to get you started:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please be sure to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or just three tildes (~~~) to produce your name only. If you have any questions, or are worried/confused about anything at all, please either visit the help desk, or leave a new message on my talk page at any time. Happy editing, good luck, and remember: Be Bold!

— FireFox • T [11:04, 3 April 2006]

You reverted my edit!

Why did you revert my delightful $e^{i\pi }$ logo for the {{User Maths Subject}} template? I changed many of the subject userboxes to contain pics, as is custom. The logo I chose is a common respresentative for mathematics. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marco Polo (talk • contribs)

Please don't edit others' userpages

As you did here. It is considered vandalism.--Isotope23 14:22, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

...and editing my userpage is also vandalism, as well as an attempt to make a WP:POINT. Please try and make some positive contributions to Wikipedia.--Isotope23 12:52, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to User:Isotope23, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. | Mr. Darcy talk 02:39, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 48 hours as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. | Mr. Darcy talk 17:36, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"l"

Thank you for correcting the "l". Maybe that´s why it´s advanced and not perfect. However I am really sorry, that you we´re banned. I´m looking forward to your future contributions and hope you will help to improve Wikipedia. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tresckow (talk • contribs) 18:20, 10 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

"english"

It´s English not "english". That's a reason why you should reconsider if you are able to contribute at the same level as a native speaker.--Tresckow 06:12, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The userbox says, "This user is a native speaker of English." It makes no claim as to the level that I can contribute at. Yes, my failure to capitalize properly is on the same level as you mispelling 'useful'. But it is not the same as this. There are many other examples of this poor English usage.

Two more things: when User:MrDarcy reverted my edit to your page, he also changed 'useful' back to 'usefull'; and, when you write above, "However I am really sorry, that you we´re banned" you shouldn't use a comma and there shouldn't be an apostrophe in we're. --Kronecker 11:59, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Read WP:NPA please. Keep the conversation focused on improving articles, not on critiquing each other's spelling. If there is a typo in an article fix it. If you disagree with a person's user-box, ignore it. ---J.S ^(T/C) 21:13, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK. You speak one language. In the future please don´t mess with another persons user-box. --Tresckow 00:08, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't...

I would appreciate it if you do not call me an idiot on my user page. I have been adopted on wikipedia and am learning how to write articles properly, so i don't need you to tell me im an idiot because:

 Are you an idiot? That plot synopsis wasn't encyclopædic at all. You shouldn't
 capitalize titles either - use italics. --Kronecker 07:12, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

This is immature of you and i would appreciate it if you would not do it.

Thanks Alec

With regards to edit on the above user's talk page:

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, we remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

Please keep comments targeted on content, not the contributors. Thanks. Tony Fox (arf!) 15:33, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ha Ha

Touche. I gotta admit, I was in an awful mood when I made that remark. I noticed you calling that poor person an "idiot," and the whole "ae" or whatever is a serious pet peeve of mine. Though I still disagree with your name-calling, I'm sorry for butting in and I'm the last person to lecture on that subject. So let's part as non-enemies. --Tractor kings fan 10:24, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

talkpage comments

Stuff like this is at best completely unnecessary incivility and at worst a personal attack. Comment on the edit not the editor.--Isotope23 01:30, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Involvement with administrator

You have been reported by Tresckow to administrators here. --24.136.230.38 23:56, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Who the fuck are you? --Kronecker 07:38, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I've blocked you for one week for your apparent unwillingness to be civil. Examples here in the edit summary and, well, right above this post. Enjoy your time off. Please try to be more considerate of other users when you return. | Mr. Darcy talk 00:35, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Go fuck yourself. --Kronecker 12:16, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why, yes, I'd be happy to block you indefinitely. | Mr. Darcy talk 22:13, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kronecker (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't ask to be unblocked immediately, just that my block be reduced. I find an indefinite block to be a bit excessive, considering I've made a number of useful contributions over the past year or so. I suspect the severity of my punishment is due mostly to a personal animosity between MrDarcy and I. I know I was acting uncivil, but maybe reducing the block to a year or a few of months may be more appropriate. Even if the indefinite block is justified, I'd like another administrator to make the call as it seems to me a little unethical that a person involved in the dispute is the one who is doing the blocking. --Kronecker 12:38, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Indefinite does not mean infinite. When we are convinced that you will no longer act in an uncivil manner, no longer engage in personal attacks and foul language here on the Wikipedia, we will consider an unblock by request. — Yamla 14:16, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note for any administrator who may decide to reconsider the above plea. Our foulmouthed friend continues to abuse editors in September 2007. Rockpocket 19:11, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes he does! --Kronecker 08:43, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]