User talk:Krobbyzw

Ways to improve Thomas Meikle

Hi, I'm TheInformativePanda. Krobbyzw, thanks for creating Thomas Meikle!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. The reference that is listed does not lead anywhere when clicked on. The tag can be removed if the link is fixed.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. TheInformativePanda (talk) 23:38, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Meikle

Hi Krobbyzw, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thanks for creating the Thomas Meikle article. I've done a bit of work on it.

In answer to your question on the article talk page, there is no reason why a cited reference needs to be in print to be valid. I've expanded your reference to include more details of the book (editor, publisher, year); and I was surprised to find that someone has scanned the Thomas Meikle section from the encyclopaedia and put it online, so I have included a link to that too. I also found an obituary of Thomas Meikle in The Times newspaper and have cited that, as well as a couple of other sources.

Best regards, – Hebrides (talk) 10:33, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Grace Family Church Rockford

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Grace Family Church Rockford requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Melcous (talk) 23:06, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Megalodon has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Megalodon was changed by Krobbyzw (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951823 on 2020-10-24T19:01:01+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:01, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Krobbyzw! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Timeline question, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:John Lionel Blakiston

Hello, Krobbyzw. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:John Lionel Blakiston, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:03, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:John Lionel Blakiston

Hello, Krobbyzw. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "John Lionel Blakiston".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:20, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Uneeda biscuit (January 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://americanbusinesshistory.org/uneeda-business-history-the-nabisco-story/. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Uneeda biscuit may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 12:19, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Krobbyzw (talk) 12:20, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Krobbyzw! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 12:19, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]