User talk:Krj373/Pg7

Do Not Post Here this is an archived page
Please post any & all messages on my main page located
Here

This is a subpage of Krj373's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

This is the Talk page for both Krj373 & Krj373-NR. If you wish to leave a message for either user please post it here.

Talk Pages

Current Page

User_talk:Krj373

Oldest ➠ youngest

Purge link

This is a Purge link for the page you are currently on. There is no reason to click it unless something looks out of date. An example would be if I did some archiving and the list of pervious pages is not yet updated on the current page.

pending changes reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Wikipedia:Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. Katie^talk 22:05, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lincoln memorial

Maybe this will teach you to put your article on lock so no one can mess with it Dr hannah reg (talk) 19:40, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Page locks are only used as a last resort. One user referring to the Lincoln memorial as being a fart does not require that strong of a response. The fast majority of Reg users & IP users do not commit vandalism. Krj373 (talk) 20:15, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Removing AfD template

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with My names jeff. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:55, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CIWS-FM

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

. Vandalism and or possible sock puppetry. I am am not sure. on the accuracy/validity of the changes and am not comfortable in reverting to a previous version at this time.

Someone else saw it and reverted everything 3 minutes after you posted. Grin. I'll just mark this help request as answered. Alsee (talk) 18:47, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Whistle Radio

Hi there thanks for your info, A post was made 16 December 2015 that is inaccurate. I want to update the content with the latest information and current status according to the CRTC. The old content is inaccurate and damaging to the station. The accuracy of the current information can be verified by the organization.

WizardCIWS (talk) 20:23, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You should put the reasons for the change on the article's talk page and why you feel it is necessary. I am not familiar with the station & do not know the details of what you believe is in error. Your edits do appear to be promotional and that is against some Wikipedia policy. If you have good reason to believe a change is warranted they may however be accepted. Krj373 (talk) 20:30, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok great thanks for the information WizardCIWS (talk) 20:35, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You dope!

	You dope, I sent a POTSTICKER!
	Thank you for your contribution, I really appreciate it. Potguru (talk) 21:26, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your ignorant warnings

I have a dynamic IP. (Look it up if you don't know what that is.) As a result of my ISP's practices of using dynamic IPs, which I have no control over, ‎Lord Laitinen has plastered sockpuppet/vandalism warning all over those IP talk pages. I have been attempting to remove those egregiously ignorant warnings, as I am allowed to do per WP:BLANKING, but a bot won't allow me to remove an entire warning at once. So I'm forced to remove part at once. Removing a warning is perfectly legitimate per WP:BLANKING and *NOT* vandalism. 32.218.43.204 (talk) 23:21, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please try to keep the discussion civil. Insults in comments & edit history's are not necessary or appropriate. If what you are saying is true. I would suggest you to create a account. It will keep your edit histories in one place & remove any appearance of sock puppetry. A large percentage of residential internet users have a dynamic IP. I have worked as a network admin. I do understand how these things work & why they are used. Have a good day. Krj373 (talk) 16:18, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please try to respect IPs. There is NO requirement that dynamic IPs register to edit. I suggest you get over it. 32.218.36.172 (talk) 16:11, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I never claimed there was. However if you IP is using load balancing and switching IP addresses as quick as it appears it would eliminate that appearance. I will again point out the WP:civil guidelines. Your tone appears aggressive & some of you previous edit comments appear rather rude. Granted what is intended and what is interpreted can be two very different things. Krj373^{*(talk), *(contrib)} 16:18, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just what about "Please try to respect IPs" is "aggressive"? 32.218.36.172 (talk) 16:25, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I believe we have both made our points. Continuing this conversation any longer will have no benefit. Krj373^{*(talk), *(contrib)} 16:34, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2015–16 Sunfoil Series

{{Help-me|The edits on this page look odd could some one with knowledge in the area review.}}

The chances of attracting an editor who's familiar with South African cricket with a help-me template is pretty low. I'd recommend reaching out to WikiProject Cricket as a start, or at least one of its members. --Nick⁠—⁠^Contact/_Contribs 07:12, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Aijaz Haider Wattoo

How can i share my ideia or thoughts to google — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aijaz Haider Wattoo (talk • contribs) 17:19, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am afraid I do not understand what you want to do? Can you rephrase and ask again. Krj373^{*(talk), *(contrib)} 17:23, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:44, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

What did I do wrong? I took one page, put its content on another, and said I was merging them. Am I supposed to ask people if they think it should be merged? It makes no sense to have to go through all that process just because you think that's how it's supposed to happen.--2601:140:8200:DE:3005:7302:9C2B:33D8 (talk) 22:46, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Let me revert it back to the standard and I will place the templates. Do it this way allows the edit history to follow the text. Krj373^{*(talk), *(contrib)} 22:49, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No that's the wrong king of merge. It says so on Wikipedia:Merging. You're thinking of history merging. I'm following Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia which says that all that's needed is putting a link in the edit summary to say that the merge is done.--2601:140:8200:DE:3005:7302:9C2B:33D8 (talk) 22:51, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

to combine these two articles the histories will have to be merged. As the editors of the old text do receive credit in the new article. Krj373^{*(talk), *(contrib)} 22:53, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No they do not. Read Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and Wikipedia:Merging. All that anyone has to do is to say in an edit summary "This was merged from Kamen Rider Black RX (character)" and that's what I did. The two pages' histories do not have to be combined into one page. You do not know what you're doing.--2601:140:8200:DE:3005:7302:9C2B:33D8 (talk) 22:55, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

wxdb-lp edits

Hello,

Thanks for your questions on my attempted edit on the WXDB LP page. I was the person who did the work raised the money and launched the Charleston, WV low power FM station. The article is detrimental to my character. I have been portrayed in a “false light” where the information written is not technically false, but is misleading. The problems relating to the demise of WXDB where due to my mental and emotional well-being at the time not based on my radio management abilities. The information on this page stains my reputation. Thereful I request your help with my edits.

Burr Beard — Preceding unsigned comment added by Evolver53 (talk • contribs) 03:53, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined speedy deletion nomination of Pete Drungle

Hi! Thanks for your speedy deletion nomination of Pete Drungle, but I've declined it.

I believe the article makes a credible claim of significance, so CSD A7 doesn't apply.
Assuming the subject passes the notability test, excision of the purely promotional bits would leave enough material for a decent article, so CSD G11 doesn't apply.

That said, just because it doesn't qualify for speedy deletion doesn't mean it belongs here, so I do encourage you to submit it to AfD. larryv (talk) 20:52, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]