User talk:Kritikos99
Welcome!
Hello, Kritikos99, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:45, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
DSE
[edit]Nice translation. I had some edit comflits with you. Go ahead, I will continue later. Andreas (T) 16:38, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Good job. I'll try and take care of the problem with the image. It needs to be uploaded to the "commons" wiki so that all language wikis can access it. By the way, if you're still learning the markup and stuff, the best way to do that is to use the "Show preview" function frequently, that way you can try out a tweak without actually committing the edit to the history. Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:19, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- We have a problem with that image, because we have no source information, and the claim on the Greek wiki that it's public domain seems a bit doubtful to me (50 years old photos are not normally out of copyright yet in most jurisdictions). The uploader on el-wiki seems no longer to be active. If you could find out where that image is from and what its copyright status is, we could transfer it. Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:26, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the tips about "show preview" Future Perfect. Am I right in thinking that it does not show you links in action etc?kritikos99 17:45, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Try it out, it does. :-) Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:47, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- I guess my links just aren't working.... Any chance you could look at the table of contents? kritikos99 17:50, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Links that are not active will show in red. Usually that is because of a difference is spelling, so Marko Vafiathi should be Markos Vafiadis. This gives you the opportunity to correct them. Andreas (T) 17:52, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Do not put the table of contents into the article. You should mark section headings with double equal signs, then the table of contents appears automatically. (If you are editing this talk page, see ==DSE== above to see how it works) Andreas (T) 17:57, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Greece?
[edit]By the way, have you already met your friendly neighbours from the WikiProject Greece? Must get you in touch with Yannismarou and the other Greek history buffs there. Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:05, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Not yet had time to be in touch, nor even investigated WikiProject Greece, but will do. Thanks for mentioning. Can't say I'm that much of a history buff, but certainly interested in helping with the project. kritikos99 15:20, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Andreas, thanks for the tips re table of contents. I understand now.kritikos99 15:20, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to the League of Copyeditors!
[edit]Thanks for joining. Please see the project page for general instructions and announcements, including details of our February participation drive. Again, welcome! BuddingJournalist 00:43, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
DSE article
[edit]I changed the npov tag you had placed to unreferenced. Was there something particularly pov that I didn't notice? Treiskaitetarto 06:18, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- I may just not be familiar enough with policy in this area. I am very new to Wikipedia. It just sounds like the whole world is against the DSE... Others might say that more atrocities etc were committed by the left. Should the article be more balanced or is it justified to only present a Left viewpoint because the article is titled DSE and therefore looks at things from their point of view? I don't know. kritikos99 10:19, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
League of Copyeditors roll call
[edit]Greetings from the League of Copyeditors. Your name is listed on our members page, but we are unsure how many of the people listed there are still active contributors to the League's activities. If you are still interested in participating in the work of the League, please follow the instructions at the members page to add your name to the active members list. Once you have done that, you might want to familiarise yourself with the new requests system, which has replaced the old /proofreading subpage. As the old system is now deprecated, the main efforts of the League should be to clear the substantial backlog which still exists there. The League's services are in as high demand as ever, as evinced by the increasing backlog on our requests pages, both old and new. While FA and GA reviewers regularly praise the League's contributions to reviewed articles, we remain perennially understaffed. Fulfilling requests to polish the prose of Wikipedia's highest-profile articles is a way that editors can make a very noticeable difference to the appearance of the encyclopedia. On behalf of the League, if you do consider yourself to have left, I hope you will consider rejoining; if you consider yourself inactive, I hope you will consider returning to respond to just one request per week, or as many as you can manage. Merry Christmas and happy editing, The League of Copyeditors. |
Melon‑Bot (STOP!) 17:59, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Call Me Burroughs
[edit]Thank you for that clarification regarding Ringo's apartment. That was how I intended to write it in the first place, but didn't. Simple carelessness on my part. At any rate, thanks! ---RepublicanJacobiteTheFortyFive 15:59, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- No problem, I could see your brain had got ahead of your fingers! Happens to us all.kritikos99 (talk) 16:13, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 13
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Albert Lee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hot Band (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Kritikos99. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Kritikos99. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Kritikos99. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]Your thread has been archived
[edit]Hi Kritikos99! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)