User talk:Kristopher10

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Nimbley6 (2nd) for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Kevin Forsyth (talk) 13:35, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ashdale

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ashdale, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Ashdale. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 11:52, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Longpark

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Longpark, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Longpark. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 13:06, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Kilmarnock Academy, you will be blocked from editing. Kevin Forsyth (talk) 13:10, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Longpark

I have nominated Longpark, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Longpark. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 21:52, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]