User talk:Kristin carlicci

July 2022

Hi Kristin carlicci! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Sexy Vegan several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Sexy Vegan, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. GabberFlasted (talk) 14:08, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am content at the current state but what u should understand was Petsemetary is a severe hater & just posted a bunch of severe libel and defamation & I have been a fan of Sexy for years so it is wrong of a man’s good name to be so severly defamed. If u lock the page then at least haters cant come in and vandalize as easily. Kristin carlicci (talk) 14:24, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am not a "hater". I neither know nor care about Sexy Vegan as a person. I'm Canadian, and some American YouTuber is of little to no concern of mine beyond creating the article with the cited sources. I am sorry if the cited sources bothered you, but it's public knowledge at this point that Vegan is a convicted criminal, and also that his music is unpopular. This does not mean that Vegan is an objectively bad person, or that you have no right to support him, but you misunderstand what Wikipedia exists for. It is not here to create puff pieces for public figures. In any case, the Sexy Vegan article has been nominated for deletion, so if you want to discuss that any further, there is now a deletion page. PetSematary182 (talk) 18:57, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will back off and not edit but if people edit & revert it back to the libel then that libel needs to go away cause it is wrong. I have no problem doing what u say cause page is fine now. But if Petsemetary comes back and starts their vandalism please block them. Kristin carlicci (talk) 14:26, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is wrong of a man’s good name to be so severly defamed...he defamed his own name when he posted a video of himself sexually abusing an animal. I dread to think where that $10 came from...enjoy! – ².O.^Boxing 10:13, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. XtraJovial (talk • contribs) 18:15, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Sexy Vegan, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. XtraJovial (talk • contribs) 18:18, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi Kristin carlicci! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

I would like to take a moment to thank you for your contributions and cooperation in editing Sexy Vegan. For a new user you pleasantly surprised me by following wikipedia's best practice of Bold Editing, Reverting, and Discussion but I would still caution you not to be overly-enthusiastic in how much content you delete at once, especially when that content has already been deleted and restored. Regardless, you helped remove some serious issues with an article. I hope you enjoy your time on Wikipedia. GabberFlasted (talk) 15:14, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

pet semetary is back and doing their defamation so can you revert it back & block them Kristin carlicci (talk) 15:55, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Kristin carlicci, I'm not sure what you're talking about. I'm looking at the page's revision history and their last edit to the article was yesterday, before you began modifying the article. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:02, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i apologize, i was wrong, i saw the amatuer musician & assumed it was all the defamatory rambling but then i looked and noticed i was mistaken. If possible can we please try not to say amatuer musician because he released 5 albums and i would think he gets paid for the streams. I can’t figure out how to request protection. Kristin carlicci (talk) 16:47, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Charles Sophy—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 17:08, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:53, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 22:55, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]