User talk:Krishna7888

25 August 2023

Hi! Just wanted to clear up any confusion about your creation of the new page and your recent edit (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nannuka&oldid=1172168006). I didn't notice that you were creating a new page to redirect to, but I would suggest to not delete the page's content until your new page is published. This way, your redirect link isn't red and it's much more clear that you are intending to redirect to an existing page. Thank you for your contributions! Have a good day!

Justanotherinternetguy ε=ε=ε=ε=┌(;￣▽￣)┘ --> talk 11:37, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks for suggestion, but i don't have permission to change page name can you please change this page name to Krishna7888 (talk) 11:40, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have undone your cut-and-paste page move

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Nannuka a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Chandravarman (Chandel ruler). This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 15:10, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok let me change name of page. Krishna7888 (talk) 19:00, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. utcursch | talk 20:51, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh hello sir I'm not shock puppet of any guy is i have no right to show my ancestor history. There are many Chandel rajputs not your akshay etc whatever unblock me. Krishna7888 (talk) 05:44, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Krishna7888 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

sir I'm not shock puppet of any guy is i have no right to show my ancestor history. There are many Chandel rajputs not your akshay etc I'm just spreading history on Wikipedia with sources please unblock me. Krishna7888 (talk) 05:44, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No one has said you are a shock puppet, you are a sock puppet. You restored the specific edits of a blocked user, who themselves is a sock puppet. 331dot (talk) 08:34, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Krishna7888 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

If someone says that his name is ram and you revived it and block him so if other user write that his name is ram with sources so what does it mean how we can change the historical source and name tell me before blocking me I was just spreading history with sources and that's it if I did any violent edit without sources etc so you should block me I agree but this time why coz I writter thing same as previous user did but I used historical sources (the page is also based on that histotean book) and proper way. Please unblock me and let me spread my clan history

Decline reason:

This is completely incoherent. Yamla (talk) 11:54, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Confirmed to Gaurav2233 and C2Ratan and Krishna7888 and Basudevaa and Basudeva8811. --Yamla (talk) 11:57, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]