User talk:Krish1804

This is Krish1804's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fog Robotics (January 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Fog Robotics may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SportingFlyer talk 21:21, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Krish1804! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SportingFlyer talk 21:21, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fog Robotics (January 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Mainly, the example section reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fog Robotics and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Fog Robotics, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 04:45, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Hello Krish1804, thank you for being straightforward about your conflict of interest with Fog Robotics. However, as an editor with a conflict of interest you should avoid all mainspace edits in this topic area, especially when they could be seen as promoting this new technology. Of course you are welcome to suggest such changes with encyclopedic expert information and independent sources on the articles' respective talkpages (using Template:Request edit). I will post a few additional links after this message, please make sure to read some of the linked information, especially in WP:COI. If you have further questions, WP:Teahouse is a good forum for Wikipedia-related advice and volunteers there will be glad to help. Best regards. GermanJoe (talk) 17:14, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Krish1804. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. GermanJoe (talk) 17:14, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fog robotics has been accepted

Fog robotics, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SpinningSpark 00:21, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Spinningspark: Thank you for the acceptance and suggestions Krish1804 (talk) 11:11, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your question about COI-editing

Hello Krish1804, thank you for the mail. I hope you don't mind when I answer non-confidential details here on the talkpage. Wikipedia-related issues should be discussed and clarified here on-Wiki (imo), so other editors have a chance to follow the issue and chime in if needed. Regarding your question about applying Wikipedia "conflict of interest" guideline:

If you have a financial interest in the topic, you should completely refrain from editing the article (and all closely-related articles) yourself. Without a financial interest - for example as a researcher or author - you should use edit requests for all content that directly refers to your own projects and to research where you have been involved in some way (this aspect is briefly covered in WP:SELFCITE). I'd also recommmend to use edit requests for all edits, that could be seen as promoting new techniques, initiatives or projects. When in doubt in borderline cases, it's better to use edit requests to be safe.

Aside from these general recommendations each case is different of course. Please make sure to carefully read WP:COI and avoid directly editing any mainspace content, when you believe a relevant conflict of interest might exist for the specific situation. Hope these general advice was helpful, and thank you again for being transparent and following Wikipedia's guidelines in this situation. GermanJoe (talk) 07:56, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@GermanJoe: Thank you for your prompt response and suggestions.