User talk:Kris, Victoria = 5

March 2015 (blocked)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing, especially this edit. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:

{{unblock|reason=My brother was on my account for two weeks I did not do this, I understand if you want to block me because he was rude and it is my responsiblity but before I went to Japan for two weeks, I made some good edits}}

. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen | talk 09:50, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kris, Victoria = 5 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My brother was on my account for two weeks I did not do this, I understand if you want to block me because he was rude and it is my responsiblity but before I went to Japan for two weeks, I made some good edits

Decline reason:

In that case, this account is compromised, and cannot be unblocked. Yunshui ^雲 _水 15:00, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Comment: so is your brother the "Kris" part of the account name? Blaming your little brother isn't something that's taken very seriously on Wikipedia: click on the link to see why. Even apart from that, neither you nor your little brother has explained why your very account name itself sounds like it refers to at least two people. I've asked you, and merely had my question blanked. I'd like to hear a convincing explanation. Bishonen | talk 14:40, 18 March 2015 (UTC).[reply]
Hi Bioshen, I am Kris, I left to work in Japan for two weeks, I understand if 'blaming my little brother' isn't taken seriously, but its not my fault honestly, I made up that random name, it has my surname. My explanation is that, I know if you may not want to unblock me because it is parly my fault that he did it. Please have another think, when does this block expire? Kris, Victoria = 5 (talk) 21:21, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It is an indefinite block meaning that it does not have a definite or fixed duration. It does not mean that the block is infinite, you may be unblocked in appropriate circumstances.--5 albert square (talk) 21:57, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Actually no, that's not an option anymore (and that's without even taking the sockpuppetry into account). Basically, if someone else has access to this account, we can no longer be certain whether the original account holder has control of the account - with no committed identity in place on this account, there is no way to verify whether we are communicating with the original account holder or the person who has hacked the account. There are therefore no circumstances under which this account will be unblocked. Note that creating a new account is also not an option, since it appears that you have already been abusing multiple accounts. At this point, your most likely route to editing Wikipedia again is to take the standard offer and appeal in six months from your original account. Note that "most likely" is a long way from "definite". 22:05, 18 March 2015 (UTC) (message from Yunshui)

Hello, I understand if you want to block me, but I really want it to expire. Kris, Victoria = 5 (talk) 05:41, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppeting

Who is accusing me of sockpupperting, I am not playing such childish games.

Kris, Victoria = 5 (talk) 01:45, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]