User talk:Krd lmg

License tagging for File:TF Portrait Noboru Morikawa.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:TF Portrait Noboru Morikawa.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:05, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pointless

Please read this. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:52, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Teresita Fernández, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Museum of Fine Arts. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

Hello, I'm Glane23. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Terry Rosenberg with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Geoff ^{Who, me?} 23:53, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Terry Rosenberg with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Geoff ^{Who, me?} 23:56, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Conflict of Interest

Hey Krd Img, I noticed that over at Glane's talk page you said that you are making edits to the Terry Rosenberg article on behalf of Terry Rosenberg. On Wikipedia, this is known as a conflict of interest, because you are contributing to articles about you or someone you have a close connection to, such as your employer. This is generally discouraged because it may be hard to write articles from a neutral point of view, but don't worry. For how to proceed from here, I'd recommend reading Wikipedia's guide for managing a conflict of interest. In the future, it would be best to avoid making direct edits to the Terry Rosenberg page. Instead, you could either create a draft and make edits to that, make edit requests on the talk page of the article, or ask for help from another user, which I would be happy to provide. If you have any questions feel free to ask over at my talk page. Pishcal — ♣ 00:57, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pishcal: Hello Pischal, I do not see my contribution as a conflict of interest as I am only editing the format and not the actual content on the page. The page was written by someone else who did not cite anything properly. I don't have a personal relationship with the Terry Rosenberg, rather I reached out to him to clear up some of the formatting issues. Thank you for your comment. I appreciate your diligence.Krd lmg (talk) 02:29, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I just wanted to inform you, but please remember to be cautious, and again, feel free to ask me anything over at my talk page. Also, just as a reminder, don't forget to sign any comments you leave on talk pages by typing 4 tidles (~) in a row at the end of your post, like so: ~~~~. This will automatically sign and date your post for you. Pishcal — ♣ 01:53, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pishcal: Thank you Pischal! Krd lmg (talk) 02:28, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]