User talk:Krator/Archive/Archive 5
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Krator. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | → | Archive 10 |
SupCom has an expansion apprently. I'd look into it to keep up the standards of the article.--Clyde (talk) 22:58, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
- Grr. Was on vacation. --User:Krator (t c) 16:18, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
- Well you bounce back pretty fast, so that's good.--Clyde (talk) 22:06, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
- Looked into the issue, and it seems not much is known about the expansion. I'll probably make a good section once the previews start dripping in, if no one beats me to it. --User:Krator (t c) 22:32, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
- It's not about adding information, it's about keeping the information encyclopedic, and correct, and dealing with all the new accounts from forums who disagree with you.--Clyde (talk) 23:27, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
- :P --User:Krator (t c) 23:31, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
- It's not about adding information, it's about keeping the information encyclopedic, and correct, and dealing with all the new accounts from forums who disagree with you.--Clyde (talk) 23:27, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
- Looked into the issue, and it seems not much is known about the expansion. I'll probably make a good section once the previews start dripping in, if no one beats me to it. --User:Krator (t c) 22:32, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
- Well you bounce back pretty fast, so that's good.--Clyde (talk) 22:06, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
Editor review
Hi there. I've added some background links to my editor review. Thanks for offering to do this. Tim Vickers 22:01, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for your comments, I will consider them carefully and try to apply your advice in the future. Tim Vickers 02:29, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
response
I just answered to your message on my own discussion page, I didn't know where to do it, frankly. Tailindil 12:37, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- I again answered on my own discussion page Tailindil 22:19, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Ivana Miličević
I'll be interested to see how long that change lasts. Caesar wasn't born in the powder keg. I tend to agree with your assessment, but that wording was added to stop the article from being a constant edit war over Ms. Miličević's ethnic and national heritage... anyway, should be interesting.--Isotope23 19:43, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
- Interesting detail: I visited the page from Wikipedia:Lamest edit wars. --User:Krator (t c) 19:45, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, I'm the one who added it there after getting in the middle of a distinctly pointless battle over whether she is Croatian or Bosnian. It got to the point where I actually started caring which it was... then a couple editors came up with some nice consensus wording and the whole thing has been rather quite for months.--Isotope23 20:00, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
- Apologies for stirring up trouble then, but at least I'm not letting awful wordings stay in the name of not offending others. That would be terribly political correct. --User:Krator (t c) 20:02, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
- Don't sweat it... I actually like this wording better anyway; it was Yugoslavia when she was born there so really that is the most factually accurate statement that can be made.--Isotope23 20:12, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
- Changing the name of the birthplace of all of the thousands of historical biography articles to the current name is kind of hard, too. --User:Krator (t c) 20:13, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
- ...and so it begins.--Isotope23 13:29, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- Honestly don't care. --User:Krator (t c) 14:10, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- ...and so it begins.--Isotope23 13:29, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- Changing the name of the birthplace of all of the thousands of historical biography articles to the current name is kind of hard, too. --User:Krator (t c) 20:13, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
- Don't sweat it... I actually like this wording better anyway; it was Yugoslavia when she was born there so really that is the most factually accurate statement that can be made.--Isotope23 20:12, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
- Apologies for stirring up trouble then, but at least I'm not letting awful wordings stay in the name of not offending others. That would be terribly political correct. --User:Krator (t c) 20:02, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, I'm the one who added it there after getting in the middle of a distinctly pointless battle over whether she is Croatian or Bosnian. It got to the point where I actually started caring which it was... then a couple editors came up with some nice consensus wording and the whole thing has been rather quite for months.--Isotope23 20:00, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your generous input
Yikes. Ok Krator, I already noticed your post on Sally Acorn. I thought that would be evident by the furious amounts of edits I've made in the past 48 hours, but if not......Thanks your for the advice. Johnnyfog 21:36, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
TS2
I added some more citations and explained some of the jargon on TimeSplitters 2. -Wi Account ki 04:13, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
Duke Nukem Forever
Hi. I've replied and added a post about how to fix this problem. hbdragon88 21:56, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- Do you just not know how to fix proseline? DNF's long development just...weell, it gives rise to a timeline. This isn't Final Fantasy VII where the development was reasonable and you could easily divide it into atmosphere, marketing etc. hbdragon88 01:08, 30 July 2007 (UTC)