User talk:Kraplyna

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

January 2024

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Roman Shukhevych. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 17:05, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Agree, the article should not have opinions, and that's why all of my edits are from well documented rigorous research, all with citations. This article needs more such citations, including those from very comprehensive recent research. Kraplyna (talk) 12:42, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't delete someone else's comments like you did here without giving a reason, particularly when it is an attempt at discussion due to your edit warring. Mellk (talk) 12:52, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, this was an accident. I meant to reply to them. I couldn't find them later. Kraplyna (talk) 11:33, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could you revert the change that deleted information on Russian missile destroying Shukhevych museum, please in 2024? This is current information that this article needs to include to provide not only historical but also current context. Thank you. Kraplyna (talk) 12:17, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]