User talk:Krano/Archives/Archive 3
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Krano. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | → | Archive 8 |
Bourne Publishing Group
I have spent a large amount of time and effort on my page to attempt to make it as informative and unbiased as possible. I have used the EMAP pages as a guide and they remain online without alteration? Can you please inform me why one is OK and ours is not? Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by John-Joe Vollans (talk • contribs) 15:09, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
I have reread the article and your comments and I apologize , with the additional information you gave a might remove the csd tag but can you do me a favor and ask another editor for opinions about your article if he says keep I'll remove the csd tag. but have you checked over wp:bio & wp:notability ?
Alexnia (T) @ 16:27, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
- I have been dealing with article for the past 3-4 hours, having to revert removal of edit tags several times, as well as, having to replace your speedy delete tag that the editor removed himself. I only replaced this tag today, appears to have been missing for 2-3 days. As to the content of the article, I believe it still reads like an advertisement, has no sources, and have googled to see notability and received little return on the search.--«JavierMC»|Talk 16:39, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
so were back to delete? Since I'm not a good enough editor to improve it my self and the author seems to be a worker in publishing group dosn't that also violate wp:selfpromotion.
Alexnia (T) @ 16:47, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
- I would say that's a good analysis of things. I would leave it for admin review of the speedy delete, but as things stand now the article is full of WP violations and copyedit errors.--«JavierMC»|Talk 16:53, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
damn speedy declined lets try afd :)
Alexnia (T) @ 17:21, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
- I added a comment at your sockpuppet filing, but I'm not sure how it will go. They are kind of sticklers for correctly formatting the report. :) I noticed that the main editors on the article all appeared to be new, same edit habits, and when I would revert one edit another of the editors would remove the templates for me to have to revert again. All seem to ignore the article talk page equally.--«JavierMC»|Talk 19:10, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
Kraftwerk K9
I didn't read what I should have read and I must apologize. Kudos on your speed and ferocity. Is it okay to have that kind of a page as my user page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kraftwerkk9 (talk • contribs) 21:41, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
Jup it's allowed
Alexnia (T) @ 16:38, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
ERROR: Please enter the username parameter when using the {{Talkback}} template - thus {{Talkback|<username>}}.
I put up a justification for the South African Wars (1879-1915) page. It should be finished in a couple of weeks--there is a team of people working on it. Let me know if there are still problems.
I think you may have been a bit harsh in your tagging of this newbie article. Remember the don't bite the newbies policy. Also, I can't see that there is anything advertising-like or NPOV in the article. It DOES need some cleanup to meet standards, but in general it looked like a pretty good first effort.WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:29, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
yup I was a bit too harsh with the tagging but I can't see how I have been bity ( I put back the templates which still matter on the article
Alexnia (T) @ 16:33, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
Nadav Perl
This oage is real and the discovery occurred about 1 year ago please put it back. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fflking201 (talk • contribs) 17:01, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
I can't put it back you have to talk to a Admin who has the rights to recreate pages (see the message I left on your talkpage)
Alexnia (T) @ 17:05, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
Cristopher Tronco Sánchez
May you write more about paralympic swimmer Cristopher Tronco? Kalev Kask 18:36, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
nope I can't help you out there I have very limited knowledge in the sports area ;)
Alexnia (T) @ 18:38, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
AfC
Hi, thanks for helping out at AFC. When you decline a submission you might find it easier to just use the "D" option of the {{tl|AFC submission}} template. Please check the documentation of this template for more information. And it is no longer necessary to collapse submissions. Any questions, just ask. Thank again, MSGJ 16:05, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
thanks for noticing me next time I'll keep that in mind.
Alexnia (T) @ 19:57, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
Your NPWatcher application
Dear Alexnia,
Thank you for applying for NPWatcher! You've been approved to use it. Before you run the program, please check the changelog on the application page to see if there is a newer release (or just add the main page (here) to your watchlist). Report any bugs or feature suggestion here. If you need help, feel free to contact me or join NPWatcher.
—αἰτίας •discussion• 21:11, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for September 15, 2008.
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 37 | 15 September 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 04:58, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
I have edited the page you had intended to delete. Please check out the page once more. Thanks.
I have checked it over and it stil fails wp:notable & wp:npov lets just wait till a admin comes by and checks the page.
Alexnia (T) @ 10:35, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
Vandalism by 78.149.211.193 (talk)
I noticed that you reverted an edit by 78.149.211.193 (talk) earlier today. For your information, I have reverted another vandalism made by this user and warned this user again. Basketball123456 (talk) 16:44, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
well you didn't need to notice me about that ;)
Alexnia (T) @ 18:19, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
Jatilsharma (talk) 19:04, 21 September 2008 (UTC) Page deleted about Yateesh M Acharya
Jatilsharma (talk) 19:04, 21 September 2008 (UTC) Hi Alexnia,
I've tried to retain the information a couple times but it got deleted from wiki.
Would you please let me know what do I have to do to give this information a permanent place in wiki?
I know this person very well and can provide many vital information.
Regards, Jatil
before I make a comment have you read wp:source and wp:bio ?
I have checked the deletion log of the article it was first deleted under wp:a1 & wp:a7 have you read these articles after your article Has been tagged for deletion?
Alexnia (T) @ 19:07, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
Yes I've gone through these links but still feel that my page should be there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jatilsharma (talk • contribs) 19:21, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
I Have asked an admin to email me the deleted article . I will then check it to see what improvements it needs to pass wp:csd . Please be patient I don't know how long it will take for the admin to respond.
there I retrieved the article and placed it on my sandbox. It defiantly needs sources. Also it was copy and pasted from the source which violates wikipedia's copyright policy. You can if you want further Improve the article from my sandbox till I find it passes wp:csd
Alexnia (T) @ 19:34, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
Certainly
I have no problems with that. Feel free to create a user subpage for the coaching in your userspace any time you wish, and we'll begin. Moreschi (talk) 20:29, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
Done - check userpage header ; please start off the page and I'll reply tomorrow I have to go to bed ;)
Alexnia (T) @ 20:38, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
Just a note that I removed your A7 speedy because there was definitely a claim of importance or significance asserted in the article. It does not have to be referenced to survive a speedy. Morbidthoughts (talk) 19:25, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
oh fine thanks for telling me that I usually think musicians are not notable enough when they don't have a source
Alexnia (T) @ 19:27, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
re
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
– iridescent 19:44, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
Talkback!
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 20:34, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Do you want to reconsider one or two of those templates now that the article has existed for more than 60 seconds? :-) Matt's talk 08:53, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
fine great work on that one removed all tags but I'm still concerned about the notability
Alexnia (T) @ 08:57, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
Fair enough, I'm working on it. Their branding is all over Fujian, it's just that the reliable sources are in Mandarin. 09:00, 27 September 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by M.R.Forrester (talk • contribs)
GhostRobot
Hey, if you look at his page, you'll also see he's been accused of SOCKing, and that proposed SOCK (Ling or something like that) has started a few articles related to Pixar movies (Wall-E is a Pixar movie). Coincidence that out of nowhere a WALLE2009 account pops out, and GhostRobot, a suspected SOCK of a Pixar-contributing editor, comes along and takes off tags? I think not! Let me knw wat u think! Thx! ←Signed:→Mr. E. Sánchez Get to know me! / Talk to me!←at≈:→ 09:55, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
- It's Lyle, not Ling. Check this: [1] ←Signed:→Mr. E. Sánchez Get to know me! / Talk to me!←at≈:→ 09:56, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
yeah I bet WALLE2009 is a sockpuppet of GhostRobot and lyle should fill out another sockpuppet fill out ?
Alexnia (T) @ 11:35, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
- I'll chill on it for now, but if it starts up again, I'll go ahead and do so. Or you can do it; it's the same either way;. Thx! ←Signed:→Mr. E. Sánchez Get to know me! / Talk to me!←at≈:→ 11:52, 27 September 2008 (UTC).
stop I dd it already ;)
Alexnia (T) @ 11:53, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
re report to WP:AIV regarding Britto 007 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
The report had been removed before I got your message and link. As I said, you need to speak to the admins who userfied and moved the content; it does appear that Britto 007 is gaming the system to have his (own) non notable bio in place, but AGF means that they may be being given a chance to provide sources to establish notability. See what the other sysops say. LessHeard vanU (talk) 16:04, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
What is wrong with my Posies page?
I'm new to this, so I may not get it at first, but what is wrong with my page on The Posies? —Preceding unsigned comment added by AwesomeManTails (talk • contribs) 17:26, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
Cut me some slack!
Alexia! It's me, AwesomeManTails again. Cut me some slack, girlfriend! I'm new to this! —Preceding unsigned comment added by AwesomeManTails (talk • contribs) 17:40, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
My RfA
-_Good_pic.jpg)
|
Thank you for supporting me in my RfA, which passed with a count of (154/3/2). I appreciate the community's trust in me, and I will do my best to be sure it won't regret handing me the mop. I am honored by your trust and your support. Again, thank you. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 19:21, 27 September 2008 (UTC) |
SMRT Buses Service 190
I am working on it...
fine I'll I'm going to move the article to your sandbox so you can edit it from there so It can't get deleted
Alexnia (T) @ 09:53, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
Sorry about deleteing the tag. I was under the impression that everyone had voted in favor of keeping the Antoinette (rapper) article on Wikipedia so I thought it was ok to delete the tag. I was not sure if the discussion was closed or not. Now I know it isn't closed yet but I along with others have been able to cite the information gathered in the article. I really hope that this information proves to be noteworthy of recognition in Wikipedia because there are people out there who will find it to be of some interest. I found it to be very useful myself. (Vermilion ink (talk) 01:53, 29 September 2008 (UTC))
no problem I Myself was a bit bity on that article because I was so concensered it wasn't notbale . Haven't I been so lazy and didn't look for sources I wouldn't have proposed it for deltion. Anywhy great wo r k on improving that article !!!
Alexnia (T) @ 06:52, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
really this user can't stop should we report him to wp:aiv or open a dispute report?
Alexnia (If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page.) @ 14:42, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
- He was reported, I reported him a second time. --CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 14:46, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
lol and now he's trying to say that the policy allows him to do what he is currently doing.
Alexnia (T) @ 14:53, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
- Whatever... let him play with himself. --CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 14:54, 29 September 2008 (UTC)