User talk:Kram333r

March 2021

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kievan Rus'; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Mellk (talk) 00:25, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Kievan Rus', you may be blocked from editing. You have already been warned about this today (twice). Do Not keep changing Kiev to Kyiv in these historical articles. It is against consensus. Fyunck(click) (talk) 00:46, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disruptively edit Wikipedia, as you did at Grand Prince of Kiev. Expect to blocked the next time you change an article on historical Kiev. Fyunck(click) (talk) 00:48, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vladimir the Great and other articles

On Kyiv/Kiev, please see Talk:Kyiv/Archive 9#RfC: Kyiv/Kiev in other articles. In addition, articles such as Olga of Kiev, Kievan Rus', etc. have established English-language names and should not be changed. --K.e.coffman (talk) 00:28, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Content alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in . Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Barkeep49 (talk) 03:58, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31h for WP:3RR. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. User:Ymblanter (talk) 14:00, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anthony of Kiev historical usage

The term Kiev in this historical article's infobox should coincide with how it is used in prose. I would think you would realize this by now after all the previous warnings and blocks you've had. Fyunck(click) (talk) 06:32, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I wasn't trying to delete your edits, I've removed edits from Kedr26, user constantly vandalized articles with political intention. My apologize if you thought that I tried to remove your edits.--Kram333r (talk) 11:20, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No problem then. Cheers. Fyunck(click) (talk) 18:06, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]