User talk:Kraanky

Sock block

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:50, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kraanky (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I forgot to log in at one point inbetween edits. This is my only account. I have ZERO association with Redandready, please refer to my IP address for proof. This is an unwarranted block.

Decline reason:

As this is a checkuser block, they have looked at your IP and more. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 04:42, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kraanky (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I urge you to physically check my IP again. I have no association with Redandready. I am being dead serious. If it helps to know, I sometimes use my account at my campus, which might be the case. I am writing this with my home IP. Check between this edit and the checkuser. I promise I have no association with Redandready.Kraanky (talk) 22:36, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I think it's unlikely the two of you coincidentally decided to edit war over Libertarian political candidates. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:32, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kraanky (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Multiple people have been wanting the candidate to be included in the infobox, not just me and Redandready. I admit I have been aggressive with the edits, and I won't do it again. But I seriously have no association with Redandready, urge you to check the IP between this edit and the checkuser. I am telling the truth. I will quit making aggressive edits, and I will quit editing the Michigan gubernatorial page, if it proves that I am not abusing multiple accounts.Kraanky (talk) 17:03, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

A CU has found a technical connection, and there is strong behavioral evidence in the form of identical edits in short succession while edit-warring on the same article. As you have submitted multiple unconvincing appeals and this is a CU block, I am revoking talk page access. Further appeal should be directed to the Arbitration Committee; see Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Ban appeals. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 18:43, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.