User talk:Kozmokonstans

Dark energy, etc.

Thank you for your note. I have responded at Talk:Dark energy. By the way, your English seems perfectly good to me. --Amble (talk) 17:05, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No way. I still have English problems. For example, I do not understan one of your sentence: "That simply goes back to the overreliance on primary sources and lack of independent sources." Kozmokonstans (talk)

It means that on Wikipedia we need to find secondary sources that are independent of Paal. We can't rely on our own understanding of primary sources such as the papers by Paal himself. --Amble (talk) 08:21, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How about our own understanding of secondary sources? ;-) Sorry. Can we trust our own understanding of secondary sources and cannot trust our own understanding of primary sources? Kozmokonstans (talk) 16:28, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Generally I agree. However in this special case the abstract of those papers wrote:

Inflation and compactification from galaxy redshifts:

"... and Lambda greater than 0" and "positive Lambda term is indicated"

and Cosmological parameters and redshift periodicity

"fitting to the previous optimum at Omega(0) equals 1/3, and lambda(0) equals 2/3."

I do not think one need to has independent source to be sure these papers wrote in their abstracts those papers got Lambda in cosmology. Well, I think I also put this to Paal's talk page. Please, answer there. Kozmokonstans (talk) 15:33, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]