User talk:Koudis

hi. thought you might want to know about Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Nick_Koudis. it looks like you put user page content (stuff "about me") into an article space. if you click "user page" youll start editing your user page and can move you bio there. ta. Nateji77 05:30, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Nick_Koudis

People are understandably worried about filling Wikipedia with vanity articles, but I think this case is an example where that concern is turned into a parody. Of course if I saw your name on the credits of a picture I'd expect to be able to find an article about you on Wikipedia, but this can be a difficult sell on Wikipedia. I think an article about you probably belongs here, but I think I'm in the minority.

We delete articles if there is a "consensus to delete"; this usually means that those wanting to delete outnumber the rest by 2 to 1. You're doing okay so far, but if you have won any major photography awards, produced work that is instantly recognisable, etc, now is the time to mention it. Absolutely anything you have done that is publicly verifiable and neutral (that is, indisputable). --Tony Sidaway ^Talk 00:14, 6 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:NickKoudis1.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:NickKoudis1.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 22:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:NickKoudis2.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:NickKoudis2.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 22:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:NickKoudis4.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:NickKoudis4.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 22:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:NickKoudis3.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:NickKoudis3.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 22:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Koudis! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 237 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Robin Nixon - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:16, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Robin Nixon

The article Robin Nixon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I'm not finding any reliable sources to back up anything in this article. As far as we know, this could be a hoax.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gigs (talk) 17:00, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ben Willmore for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ben Willmore is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Willmore until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Peter James (talk) 16:03, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nick Koudis for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nick Koudis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Koudis (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Tails Wx 17:23, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]