User talk:Kosom en.wikipedi

December 2022

Hello, I'm Vaco98. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Ibn Battuta have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Vaco98 (talk) 22:08, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kosomak thank you very much ! Vaco98

Kosomak thank you very much Vaco98 Kosom en.wikipedi (talk) 22:10, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Ibn Battuta. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Philipnelson99 (talk) 22:16, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For context I removed your edits because of this part specifically: "admins often interact by blocking him to prevent him from saying the truth but he usually come back and spank their asses each time because he is smarter than them". I also want to caution you about block evasion. Philipnelson99 (talk) 22:21, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 22:30, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Amr.elmowaled per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Amr.elmowaled. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

-- RoySmith (talk) 15:07, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]