User talk:Kosmoshiva

Other Comments

Welcome!

Hello, Kosmoshiva, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! BWatkins 15:07, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Romany entry on Timeline of magic

I don't think the Romany entry is noteworthy as required by the encyclopedia nature of this timeline. You may refer to the date of womens admission to the Magic circle as an an entry, but the mention of Romany in one particular year is out of context with the other great and important magicians in the timeline of magic eg Houdin, Vernon, Houdini, Copperfield etc. Indeed there are 100's of magicians 1000 times more important than Romany who are not in the timeline of magic.

A student writing a paper based on this timeline would be out of place to mention Romany as a 2000's event on the magic timeline when there is magic such as Chris Angel, Blaine, Takyama which is dominating the real headlines. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.131.9.135 (talk) 02:18, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Research

Hi Kosmoshiva, I sent you an e-mail a couple of weeks ago about an interview for my thesis. I'd love to talk with you to hear about your perspective as a new contributor! Let me know if you can participate. Jkomoros (talk) 00:10, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RFC: Removal of magic methods - what next? More input please!

Hi! As someone who has taken part in the RFC in Project Magic, I thought you ought to be aware that it looks like a consensus is being reached, and it is probably now just a case of dotting the i's and crossing the t's. If you could pop over to the discussion and add your thoughts, that would be great. StephenBuxton (talk) 12:52, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As there have been no objections to the draft guidelines I created a while back, I have taken the bold action of making them the current guidelines. You can view the change here. If you disagree with the revised changes, or have any further comments on the change, please feel free to raise it on the project talk page. Thank you. StephenBuxton (talk) 11:38, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

About me reverting you

Usually, removing a large amount of text without putting some explanation in the edit summary is grounds for being warned and reverted. Please put some text in the edit summary (right above save) every time you can. I am sorry for the inconveniance this might have caused. Andrewrp^Tally-ho! 14:51, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mould/Mold

Thanks for telling me about mould/mold. Like you said, Canadians differentiate, and I am Canadian. Thank you. Wise dude321 (talk) 20:18, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]