User talk:Korossyl

Jack T. Chick

Please take a look at the talk page of the Jack T. Chick article (top two sections, photo & pre-Chick tract comics). If you are an editor, you may wish to act accordingly to new information provided. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.190.146.2 (talk) 15:33, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hatikvah

Hi, Laszlo,

I've seen your edit in Hatikvah article about the song "Tüzed, Uram Jézus". Do you have it in mp3? it would be very interesting to hear it. Anyway, the phrase about this song should be corrected somehow, because it's most unlikely that Shmuel Cohen would listen to Christian song directly (and Smetana's work, too, btw). Maybe this song should be mentioned along with other songs with similar melodies. --Yms 16:42, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wikipedians in Hungary

If you're interested, you can add yourself to the above category. Adam78 16:44, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Thank you!

Nope, I just userfying them on a country by country basis, per WP:GUS --Hunter 03:05, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oops!!

Your Google Earth userbox is broken. :( GreetingsEarthling 22:31, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Osorno

Hi Korossyl! Thank you for your entry on my talk page. Your article on Osorno is very timely and well-written. It is growing nicely, so it is a pleasure to contribute to it (even with a small link!) Certainly, Osorno is no strange to me (especially the subject of the article to which the link leads [[1]]). Cheers! -- Eguirald 01:14, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Osorno-seal.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Osorno-seal.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 03:43, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Himnusz

Hi. I read your translation and I found some mistakes. Could you care to read my comment? In case I'm wrong, sorry Lelkesa 16:12, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As you don't seem to be interested in the topic, maybe I'll do the necessary changes. I just wanted to warn you - for I've read the discussion on the talk page of Himnusz - that you do not seem to understand the copyright policy of Wikipedia. When you uploaded your translation, you agreed to license it under the GFDL. So now anybody can change and redistribute the text. Lelkesa 14:49, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, it seems to be a good idea to change your website at first, and then the Wikipedia article. Some thoughts:

I think that "Kunság mezein" means "on the plains of Cumania" (or "on the plains of Kunság" maybe, as there are other places in Central and Eastern Europe which are called Cumania in English), because - as I see it - "Kunság" clearly refers to the place, not the nomadic tribe (Cumans). ("The plains of the Kuns" would be "a kunok mezein" in Hungarian).
I also think that "hő" means "hot". "Faithful" is "hű", and the word "hű" have existed in our language since the 13th century, and doesn't seem to have had other forms. (I have an etymological dictionary :) )
Maybe "The Danube" should be used instead of "the Duna".
There should be an English equivalent of "hajh".

Thanks for your work. Lelkesa 09:01, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kunság is the name of the place. Period. Theoretically it could refer to the nomadic tribe, but for them we use the word kunok. Duna should be changed to Danube. Duna is the Hungarian name of the river. In English it is called Danube. Lelkesa 15:58, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

re: grammar on Irreducible complexity

I see your point now. I'm not sure how to fix it, though, since we are constrained by Behe's actual quote. He didn't say "applying to". We could fix it by not relying on the exact quote but that has been a controversial section and I'm reluctant to upset the compromise. We could fix it by changing the front of the sentence to "An "irreducibly complex system" was originally defined by Behe as..." but that also bends what was actually said.

I'm not sure how to proceed. Do you have a copy of Behe's text handy? Can we go straight to his usage and avoid putting our own interpretation on the matter? Thanks. Rossami (talk) 20:34, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notable Wikipedian

Please, don't add the tag {{Notable Wikipedian}}. Your name is neither Himnusz neither Szózat. --Eleassar ^{my talk} 12:05, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Historical Jesus

You recently reverted one of my changes to the article on the Ebionites, but did not offer an edit summary. I think my summary explained the reason for my edit pretty clearly, but no argument was made against it. I see that a whole slew of edits have not been summarized or defended, some quite substantial (e.g., changing "c. 23" to "in 23"). Edit summaries, I believe, would be helpful for the article's other editors. Korossyl 22:20, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Many of my edits were, in my mind, so minor that I didn't feel a need to add a summary. However, you are absolutely correct that they would be helpful and will try my best to always include them. On the issue of the historical Jesus, the scholars mentioned in this article make a point of arguing that the Ebionites were more faithful to the teaching of the historical Jesus (these scholars have reconstructed) rather than the Jesus of the Bible. --Loremaster 22:27, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Korossyl

Thank you; your own civility and professionalism is evident in your edits and in the discussion. I look forward to making more edits in the future together!Tourskin 02:30, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't get me started

Thank you sir for your patience. I always try to edit my entries in Wikipedia offline but that one involving BosWash had me in a state. I still ponder another edit, as the "speaker" may be broadened to include "commenter" and "writer". Wonderful to hear a positive response. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sswonk (talk • contribs) 21:55, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Otto Newman

I've removed your speedy tag from this article. Notability is asserted through publications, take the article to AFD instead if you still feel it fails notability. Exxolon (talk) 21:37, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also please consider notifying the article creator if you nominate an article for speedy deletion. Exxolon (talk) 21:38, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Petty discussion.

I got your message. I do think petty is a good word but the description of George is full. Tell you what? I'll put 'petty' and test the editors reaction for a week. I'm actually sensitive to editors reaction so I'll reconsider the word. Thanks for giving me the idea of what petty means. Johnnyauau2000 (talk) 14:05, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem

Amazing, innit? And don't worry about screwing up, I actually did with my edit summary as well, he doesn't have any more finals until thursday night (the 200 IM). SirFozzie (talk) 03:54, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hugh O'Connor Memorial Act:

The article states:
In April 1997 the Florida Senate unanimously passed The Hugh O'Connor Memorial Act, which allows people injured by drug dealers to sue for damages."

This is immediately preceded by:

After Hugh's death, O'Connor successfully lobbied to get the State of California to pass legislation that allows family members of an addicted person or anyone injured by a drug dealer's actions, including employers, to sue for reimbursement for medical treatment and rehabilitation costs. The law, known as the Drug Dealer Civil Liability Act in California, went into effect in 1997.

Eleven other states followed with similar legislation, which has been referred to as The Hugh O'Connor Memorial Law.

The first sentence quoted above, then, is redundant. No? Korossyl (talk) 04:37, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Absolutely! Thanks, --Jazzeur (talk) 15:36, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

EWTN edits

Help me out then, would you please? I freely admit to being a bit of a Wiki novice.

My motivation is not Anti-Catholic. I am Catholic and not a self-hating kind either. But if you watched it, “The World Over” is more biased, in terms of its guests, than the “700 Club”. Saying “generally” in this context is simply not accurate. I understand the importance of being neutral but not to the point that it is misleading.

If you can think of a way to phrase it better, please, please do.

SacredSpermWhale (talk) 05:50, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I sort of understand what you are saying and I sort of agree with you.

I see where I might have made a mistake in my editing. I wasn’t trying to say the entire network is far right in all aspects. Taking all of it’s stances into account, as long as the SSPXII is around, EWTN isn’t far right theologically

My problem is that “The World Over” is so biased in it’s secular politics, using the word “generally” before the word “conservative” in the context of secular politics is misleading in my opinion. While I’m not Anti-Catholic or even Anti-EWTN, I could be called Anti-“The World Over”. EWTN’s place in Catholic media is overwhelming here in the US, which isn’t normally a bad thing. But “The World Over” won’t even have a Pro-Life Democratic politician on the program. As I said “The 700 Club” seems more bi-partisan as I think they interviewed Pro-Choice non-Catholic Obama! If it was an entity onto itself, I’d wager that the IRS would be after it. Consider EWTN’s influence, I think it sends a bad message to impressionable Catholics, as my Holy Mother Church transcends vulgar party politics.

Would the change from this: “The program is generally conservative in religious and political orientation” to “The program is conservative in its political orientation and generally conservative in its religious orientation” sound proper enough? If not, you can change it back and I promise I won’t touch it again.

I am aware of that other anon editor causing problems here, I am not him or her. I actually already talked to “CliffC”, just to say that I wasn’t the one causing all the problems. That anon editor is actually a very bizarre person, if you look at the changes they keep trying to put in, they could very easily be considered both Pro-EWTN and Anti-EWTN. New as I am, that makes no sense whatsoever.

Thank you very much for being so polite.

SacredSpermWhale (talk) 06:01, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are the vandal if you do that

Dear Korossyl. Croatia wasn't a kingdom. It was conquered by Hungary and it became a provincve. All of the croatian history articles were written here by croatian nationalists. I don't want to harm you, but please don't edit about it, if you don't know anything about it. And i removed this link, beacuse it was written by nationalists as well. By. Toroko (talk) 09:24, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see you are interested in the hungarian history, so i would like to ask you don't do that, and please rather speak with those who can't bear their history and thanks to it fake it.Toroko (talk) 09:35, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Croatia wasn't a kingdom, it is only a croatian nationalistic nonsense. They claim is based on a writing, called Pacta Conventa. However, pacta conventa is a forgery. Hungarian historians proved it, and proved that there was no union and croatia wasn't a kingdom. If you state that it was, you support a nationalistic anti-hungarian view. "Mert az, hogy Horvátország hóditott tartománya volt a magyar királynak nem szenved kétséget és csak is abban a korban lehetett ezt kérdésessé tenni, melyen a nemzetiségi vágyak elöltek minden történeti érzéket." "Arra gondolni, hogy a Horvátországhoz való viszony valami personalis unio-féle lett volna, merő képtelenség, s nemcsak a kor felfogásának mond ellent, hanem még inkább a hatalmi viszonyoknak. Többé felkelésről nem is volt szó: a horvát urak, kiknek külömben is alkalmok nyilt kitüntetni magokat a magyar királyok szolgálatában, nyugodtan megmaradtak az alávetettségben" [2] This is the traditional interpretation of hungarian history. Ladislas I was only king of hungary. And don't call me vandal because it is you who vandalises the articles, you reverted my edits without any normal reason. If you always do this your edits will be reverted since you vandalise the hungarian history articles. Please read about it, I said don't edit about hungarian history if you don't know anything about it. Toroko (talk) 09:15, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Naturally i have no problem with you, i didn't want any "attack" against you. But please don't vandalise the hungarian history aricles. Toroko (talk) 09:36, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

At the Battle of Szigetvár and at the Battle of Mohács it was the part of hungary, not a kingdom. Please correct it. Toroko (talk) 09:42, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My english is bad. I am sorry. I mean "offend". In hungarian "harm" and "offend" means the same, i translated it to english badly. I wouldn't harm anybody of course. You misunderstood it. Toroko (talk) 11:22, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Obsidio Szigetiana

Magyarul írom, mert kissé fárasztó lenne ezt most szép angolsággal megfogalmazni ezen a fejfájós délelőttön: barokk kori címek esetében a publikált cím egy kényes dolog, többnyire nem azon híresül el, ami forma szerint a cím, ha van egyáltalán ilyen. A Szigeti veszedelem esetében azonban nem ez a helyzet. A voltaképpeni cím az Obsidio Szigetiana (lehet, hogy ezt kéne leginkább írni), ami a címalkotás nyelvi standardjai szerint vagy megkapja a szokványos Libri előtagot birtoknak, vagy az énekek számozását utótagnak: Obsidionis Szigetianae pars prima/secunda sat.

A Szigetiana az Obsidio jelzője (mellesleg szólván utána kéne nézni a helyesírásának, mert gyanús kissé az a kortárs 'sz'), az tehát az obsidióhoz igazodik. A birtokos esetnek semmi más indoka sincs a címben, csak az, ha szerkezetben áll a cím kiegészítő elemeivel, például: Wesselényi Miklós[nak az] Összes művei. Magányos birtokos esetek nem állnak címként se publikálva, se publikálatlanul. ;) Bennó (talk) 12:18, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Miklós Zrínyi (disambiguation)

Hello. Just to let you know this page has been nominated for speeedy deletion, per {db-disambig}. Thansk, Boleyn3 (talk) 14:47, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Szigetvár

Hello, Korossyl. You have new messages at Talk:Battle of Szigetvár#Names of Zrinsky/Zrinski/Zrínyi.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Re:Croatian Literature

Hi Korossyl. Yes you are right, Opsida Sigecka was not as successful as Szigeti Veszedelem. "Opsada Sigeta" is correct (modern) name for "Siege of Sziget", and more official one. But "Opsida Sigecka" is also correct, because it was originally written like that, in one of three dialects that still exist in Croatia. Regards, Kebeta (talk) 20:22, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help me with Szigeti Veszedelem? I would like to implement more info into Battle of Szigetvár.

Can you upload image of front page (cover) of Szigeti Veszedelem, if you have a book?
Do you know where I can read all Szigeti Veszedelem on English?

If you can help, it would be great. Thanks. --Kebeta (talk) 16:35, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, congratulations on the first-ever English translation of the Szigeti Veszedelem! --Kebeta (talk) 09:34, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Korossyl. You have new messages at Timbouctou's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Merge discussion for Nikola VII Zrinski

An article that you have been involved in editing, Nikola VII Zrinski, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Fakirbakir (talk) 09:59, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Siege of Sziget, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Illiad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

Hello!

Currently, the WikiProject Hungary is quite down with only a very limited active users, but I'd like to add some spirit into it. I think you might be interested in the project, therefore I would like to invite you to take a look at this proposal, share your opinion and participate in the life of WikiProject Hungary. If you have questions, ideas or thoughts you can add them on the talkpage of the proposal, here (I watchlist your talkpage) or you can contact me directly on my talk page. Your words are very welcomed!

Thank you!

Kind regards, Thehoboclown (talk) 11:24, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited János Vitéz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Castaway on the Moon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Han River (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lucas Cranach the Elder, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Polykarp Leyser (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:29, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Lou Albano may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:30, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Northeast megalopolis gap

Hi Korossyl...I took a second look at the MSA map and I was incorrect in that Union is part of the Hartford MSA. That would be a pretty think connection to the Worcester MSA, though. That being said, the fact still remains that the NE corner of CT is not in a MSA so I'm wondering what your thoughts on just stating that the Quiet Corner is the only gap in corridor, which is what it is known for and one of the reasons why congress designated it a National Heritage Corridor. Dbroer (talk) 19:11, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy Dbroer! I have family connections to the Quiet Corner, and I think it's worth mentioning as it does appear as a "hole" in the map of the megalopolis. It's not, however, an actual gap, as it does not prevent the MSAs from being connected. Practically speaking, one travelling from NY to Boston does not leave the megalopolitan corridor, and (usually) has no reason to pass through the QC. I think I'd be more comfortable using some language like "bypassing the Quiet Corner." What do you think? Korossyl (talk) 19:28, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ben Hur

I'm not sure what you mean that this is a 'non sequitar'. The syntax seems fine to me. Span (talk) 11:54, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Barnstar-Chile-1.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:51, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Barnstar-Chile-2.png, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:50, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brevet (military), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arthur MacArthur (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Gin and tonic may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

|accessdate=2010-06-02}}</ref> In the United States, most bars will use tonic from a [[soda gun]]);<ref name="perfect" /> to get a real gin and tonic, [[mixologist]] [[Dale DeGroff]] recommends

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:38, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sebastian Kappen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alienation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Outerwear, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mino. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Korossyl,

I see that you are a major contributor to the wiki article on the Earle Family. Thank you so much for setting up this article. I am a member of this family, descended from Ralph Earle the settler of Rhode Island. I am also a wiki author. I added a bit of structure to the article and organized the listings of Earle Family members by century.

I see that the names listed here:

George Howard Earle IV (Navy Pilot)
Mary Sharpless Earle
Elisabeth Hotchkiss Ely Shedd
George Howard Earle V (Civil Engineer)
George Howard Earle VI (Man About Town)

That do not have citations or Wiki articles. Do you know these people? Are they still living? If so, could you add their bios as articles to Wikipedia and cite those articles? Or if that is not possible, perhaps provide a citation that shows their genealogical connection to the Earle Family. For example, if there is a published book that lists their name and lineage, or a genealogical society that documents lineage who has verified the genealogy. Or if they are listed in Pliny's book, give the page number (since there are 4,000 names in that book). I don't mind helping with this, but, since I don't even know what century these individuals were born, it is difficult for me to add the information about them.

Also, there is no citation or wiki listing for

Ralph Earle (captain) (I believe there has been more than one over the years) and
James Earle (painter).

It would be great to have, at the very minimum, the date of birth and death and the citation to page number in Pliny's book.

Warm regards,

--Karen Lile (talk) 16:58, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Korossyl. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation pages- What and What Not to Include

Thank you for your edit to Lebanon (disambiguation). However, I have removed most of it, as it was unnecessary to the purpose of the page.

Disambiguation ("dab") pages aren't articles, but are navigation aids. They shouldn't include significant amounts of information beyond what it necessary for that- this belongs in the article itself.

For more information, please see WP:DABNOT.

Hope this helps, Ubcule (talk) 15:08, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(Copied from User talk:Ubcule); "Wow, that edit was a long time ago. Totally forgot about that. I know it was a bit unorthodox for a disambiguation page, but I remember looking into WP policies then (and now, that you mentioned it), and couldn't find anything about not including additional info, like the description or picture, that might be helpful or interesting. Since it didn't obscure the purpose or function of the disambiguation page, I didn't really see why it shouldn't be in there. Is there a policy that I missed? Korossyl (talk) 2:24 am, Today (UTC+0)"

You're right; it's an old edit- I wouldn't normally bother, so I'm guessing I either didn't notice its age or thought the advice might still have been useful.

No worries about not finding the info back then; I often find it hard to find policy stuff myself.

The guidelines I mentioned above- i.e. those at WP:DABNOT, a shortcut to "What not to include"- should explain it clearly enough. Put simply, dab pages are navigational aids, not articles- we want to keep them as short and clear as possible. Anything unnecessary that bloats them out and makes them longer to get through is counter-productive.

Thanks for your edits! All the best, Ubcule (talk) 20:05, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Era changes where BCE is the established style

I see you've changed BCE to BCE 6 times quoting WP:ERA. Four of those I'd agree with you, but at Göbekli Tepe BCE has been used for almost 6 years, making it the established style. It's a pretty heavily edited article and people have had a chance to revert it before but haven't. If you want to change it there, you need to comply with the guideline and start a talk page discussion. Doug Weller talk 12:05, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Korossyl. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lennus II

I restored the article with new sources. Harizotoh9 (talk) 00:46, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I know nothing about the game. Especially the story and gameplay. You can use the HG101 source to expand the story/gameplay sections. I don't really care that much about this game, and probably won't edit much more. There's also an extended interview with the director/writer in Untold Story of Japanese Game Developers Vol 3. Harizotoh9 (talk) 16:09, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Korossyl. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Aquinas-Passions.png

The file File:Aquinas-Passions.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Acta Pinteriana Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Acta Pinteriana Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:22, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]