User talk:Kornet GSR

Welcome!

Hello, Kornet GSR, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Altay (tank) has not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Scr★pIron^IV 14:19, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Scr★pIron^IV 14:32, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK But I Have One Condition.Fighter aircraft Are not Alloude To Change The Photo And Other Aircraft Were only Can Change.Deal

You violated 3RR with this edit at 02:07 UTC this morning to List of currently active Russian military aircraft. I could have blocked you for it. However, I'm refraining in the hopes that you will continue to discuss the matter at the talk page. Please continue a dialog there, but do not change the images in the article again, at peril of being blocked. —C.Fred (talk) 12:01, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring. Note that your edits via an IP while logged out are considered as well as your edits while logged in. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —C.Fred (talk) 14:39, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's generally a good idea to leave the block notice in place while you're blocked. (If you request an unblock and it's declined, then you're required to leave that notice up for the duration of the block.) Also, bear in mind that removing a notice or message left on your talk page is deemed by the community to indicate that you have read and acknowledge the message. —C.Fred (talk) 14:45, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the clarification, C.Fred. I will bear that in mind for future notifications. Scr★pIron^IV 14:49, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Fonte de regaz (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Someguy1221 (talk) 06:53, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]