User talk:Korkwand

April 2015

Hello, I'm Winkelvi. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Rodleen Getsic, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 19:08, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I did not change information about the family just put "early life" and "personal life" together.

I added information about the accident and disability since March 2010. The sources are given. -- Korkwand (talk) 19:14, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please go to the article talk page and discuss in accordance with WP:BRD. You are now edit warring and that can lead to a block from editing. The sources you provided in regard to her alleged injury are not considered reliable sources by Wikipedia standards. It's great that you want to contribute to the article, but there are ways to do it and ways you shouldn't do it. See you at the article talk page,-- WV ● ✉ ✓ 19:16, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Rodleen Getsic. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 19:18, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shock therapy (music group)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shock therapy (music group) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Tinton5 (talk) 20:33, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]