User talk:KootharaCountry

April 2016

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Fan (film). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Diff: [1] The summary of critical response you added is not supported by reliable published sources. We are not here to add our personal opinions to articles or to process or analyze information, and cherrypicking a handful of positive reviews, then describing them as "generally positive" is now how we do business here. Further, "universal praise" is a hyperbolic statement that doesn't belong in the article. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:56, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Questionable edits

Hi there, I don't understand this edit, where you inexplicably swap out a reliable mainstream source for a facelessblog like iwillrecover.com. If you plan to edit here regularly, you need to quickly become familiar with our guidelines on reliable sources as well as our dispassion for user-generated content like blogs, forums, IMDb, wikis, and so forth. I would appreciate an explanation, because this tends to look like spam to experienced editors such as myself. Further, I don't understand why you removed the box office data from the infobox in this edit. Can you please explain that? Feel free to reply here, as I've added your talk page to my watchlist. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:34, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at 24 (2016 film), you may be blocked from editing. Diff: [2] This edit is confusing as well. If you want to add another reference, add it, but please don't remove references without providing a clear explanation. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:51, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:PRIMARY

Re: this edit, we don't use primary sources for controversial content like financial data. Producers, studios, actors all have vested interests in inflating or deflating this information, depending on whatever their goal might be. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:39, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AndhraBoxOffice.com

In this series of edits you didn't address a significant concern: andhraboxoffice.com is a blog and blogs fail WP:UGC. You should probably address that on the article's talk page, lest the content be removed again as insufficiently sourced. I've already explained to you that blogs are not sufficient, so when you snippily write "Now what's wrong with you?" you're clearly asking the wrong person. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:51, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion

As you should be aware by now, you, the editor behind the various disruptive accounts you've created, have not been welcome to edit at Wikipedia for quite some time. Any edit that can be attributed to you may be reverted by any user on sight, with no consideration for accuracy, edit warring or effort expended by you. If you're going to continue to waste other editors' time by forcing them to deal with your behavioral problems, your own time will be wasted as well. Since you seem to have difficulty with this community editing project, you may find a solo hobby to be more rewarding. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:11, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning. You may be blocked from editing the next time you make a personal attack, as you did with this edit to User talk:KootharaCountry. Jim1138 (talk) 04:25, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]