User talk:Konstantina07
Welcome!
[edit]Hi Konstantina07! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 23:39, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hey, thank you very much for your welcome and the resources!! Konstantina07 (talk) 23:40, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
[edit]
You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
Doug Weller talk 14:14, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Infectious mononucleosis
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Infectious mononucleosis you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Femke -- Femke (talk) 21:03, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Infectious mononucleosis
[edit]The article Infectious mononucleosis you nominated as a good article has failed 
; see Talk:Infectious mononucleosis for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Femke -- Femke (talk) 21:20, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Is this your first account?
[edit]I ask because your edits strongly suggest it isn't. Doug Weller talk 09:17, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Doug Weller: no it is not. I used to have another account in good standing a few years ago. I decided to start editing again, the new account is partly for renaming purposes; a global rename would reveal a sensitive information about my irl identity that I wasn't feeling ready to disclose yet. I might eventually do it though. Feel free to email me if you want to further inquiry this
- My previous account is disclosed to arbcom due to having contributed in a contentious topic. Konstantina07 (talk) 10:25, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. I completely understand that. I don't need to email you. You wouldn't tell me that about ArbCom if it weren't true as I'd have no problem checking it, which of course I won't. I appreciate the openness. Doug Weller talk 11:13, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Spyridon Kapnisis has been accepted
[edit]
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
BuySomeApples (talk) 16:06, 28 March 2024 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Harshit Raja has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 13:49, 1 April 2024 (UTC)