User talk:Konstantin Emelyanov

Hello Konstantin Emelyanov. Welcome to Wikipedia.

I noticed that an article you created, User Traffic Manager has been added into the Wikipedia deletion process. Please do not remove the notice that now appears on the top of the page. You are welcome to discuss the nomination at the appropriate page (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/User Traffic Manager) - and if the page is not removed, the notice will be taken down in due time. This may be frustrating, but others like myself will continue to replace the notice if it is removed. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me. Cheers.--Bookandcoffee 17:00, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the email Konstantin Emelyanov. Although I was not the one who originally placed the deletion notice on User Traffic Manager, I'll take a short stab at outlining the reason why it was done. The article does appear to be more of an advertisement than an encyclopedic entry - but more importantly, it is just as clear that you (as the creator of the article) are involved with the company, and this often raises suspicions from both an advertising viewpoint, and also a vanity viewpoint (WP:VANITY). The editors who have commented on the deletion process at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/User Traffic Manager have provided you with several links (WP:CORP, WP:ADS) that outline some of the Wikipedia policies on this issue, and I would encourage you to read through them. Beyond that, it has been my personal observation that threats of litigation and sundry such things do nothing but entrench peoples opinions, and do not help your cause. If you are interested in advancing Wikipedia (as opposed to advancing NetUP) consider using the talk page at Talk:User Traffic Manager - provide your information there, and allow neutral editors to use what they want of that info to create an article about the software. Cheers.--Bookandcoffee 17:06, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to User Traffic Manager

Your recent edit to User Traffic Manager (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 16:10, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. The notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered vandalism. If you oppose the deletion of an article, you may comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. --Rory096 16:12, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages-- it is considered vandalism. You may comment at the respective page if you oppose an article's deletion. Thanks. --Rory096 16:14, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing Articles for deletion notices and comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages. If you continue to remove them, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Rory096 16:18, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/User Traffic Manager, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Rory096 16:20, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AFD

Hi there. I'm not going to clog up the AFD going back and forth but you do need to understand the difference between original research WP:OR and Reliable Sources. Making bald assertions on the AFD is original research. To verify the statement you need to demonstrate some independant verification such as a news paper article or trade press. Unless you can do that the facts are not going to stick and the article will be deleted as non-notable. If you can do that, I'm willing to review my stance but unless you can, please don't waste your time. Cheers --Spartaz 11:24, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:NetUP_logo.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:NetUP_logo.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 14:38, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warnings

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policy for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Thank you. [1] (Requestion 03:44, 9 April 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Image:UTM_layout.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:UTM_layout.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:17, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]