User talk:Konard

Welcome!

Hello, Konard, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as MMM-2011, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Shirt58 (talk) 13:19, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of MMM-2011

Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Shirt58 (talk) 13:19, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MMM-2011

As it stood, it was accusing someone of something with no evidence. Admittedly, the person named has been convicted previously of that sort of thing, but without rock solid sources to say he's been at the very least arrested and charged, you can't post anything saying he's at it again. This business is mentioned in the MMM (Ponzi scheme company) article, where I've added 'citation needed' tags. Unless those citations appear fairly quickly, Mavrodi's name will have to be removed. If he actually isn't provably connected, it could be libellous, so far as I can see. (I didn't know about the other article before.) Feel free to get a second or third opinion from other admins. I could be over-reacting. I'm not a lawyer and not an expert on libel. I prefer to play safe. Peridon (talk) 15:07, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It was tagged as attack, had no references (just a link to something in Russian), and contained a fairly serious allegation about someone. That is an attack, and under WP:LIBEL should be removed. Have you asked for a second opinion? BTW your links to time.com don't work for me. Peridon (talk) 20:34, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's better. That time.com link looks OK to me, so far as I'm aware it's a reliable source. Just a couple of points, though. The wording of 'Everyone visiting the site' could do with clarification. It looks ambiguous to me. It could read that the site is warning people, or that WE are warning people before they go. The other thing is that I don't think he is banned from financial business, according to time.com - "This time Vladimir Zhirinovsky, the leader of a nationalist party, has called for a court to ban Mavrodi from conducting any financial transactions whatsoever — which would be a clear violation of his civil rights" implies he wasn't banned last time. I think the info is best kept in its present place, but a redirect to it from the deleted title would be fine. Please do get a second opinion - I'm just one voice. Peridon (talk) 10:13, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]