User talk:Komulka445

This is Komulka445's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rotax 122 (September 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nagol0929 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rotax 122 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nagol0929 (talk) 13:01, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Thanks for the rapid reply. I understand that I had too unreliable and too few separate sources. I have already contacted BRP Rotax about having a proof of the patent or any other official documents. Also i am searching for the official service manuals of the motorcycles which i had listed on the page. I hope that having a proof of the patent would hold some credibility, if I will ever have one.

Sincerely,

- Komulka445 (talk) 07:38, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Komulka445 Unfortunately this still would not prove this article is notable. Unless you can find policy on this type of article im forced to use Wp:GNG. Nagol0929 (talk) 11:47, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Komulka445! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Nagol0929 (talk) 13:01, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Rotax 122

Hello, Komulka445. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rotax 122, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:06, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Rotax 122

Hello, Komulka445. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rotax 122".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:24, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]