User talk:Komponisto
|
License tagging for Image:Westerex03.PNG
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Westerex03.PNG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:07, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
Image:Scalestepex.PNG listed for deletion
[edit]An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Scalestepex.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. OsamaKReply? on my talk page, please 14:22, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
Image:Scalestep-002.PNG listed for deletion
[edit]An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Scalestep-002.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. OsamaKReply? on my talk page, please 14:23, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
== File:Westerex04.PNG missing description details ==
If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:13, 25 July 2010 (UTC)Thank you for uploading this media, It would be appreciated if you could add :
- 1-2 paragraphs explaining what is shown in the image.
- An explanation of how this image falls in the public domain.
As well as helping those categorising the image, it will help place the image in context and allow other users of the image (including academics) to make better use of the image :) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:13, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
File:Westerex05.PNG missing description details
[edit]
If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:17, 25 July 2010 (UTC)Thank you for uploading this media, It would be appreciated if you could add :
- 1-2 paragraphs explaining what is shown in the image.
- An explanation of how this image falls in the public domain.
As well as helping those categorising the image, it will help place the image in context and allow other users of the image (including academics) to make better use of the image :)
Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:17, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
File:Westerex06.PNG missing description details
[edit]
If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:21, 25 July 2010 (UTC)Thank you for uploading this media, It would be appreciated if you could add :
- 1-2 paragraphs explaining what is shown in the image.
- An explanation of how this image falls in the public domain.
As well as helping those categorising the image, it will help place the image in context and allow other users of the image (including academics) to make better use of the image :)
Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:21, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
File:Westerex07.PNG missing description details
[edit]
If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:52, 25 July 2010 (UTC)Thank you for uploading this media, It would be appreciated if you could add :
- 1-2 paragraphs explaining what is shown in the image.
- An explanation of how this image falls in the public domain.
As well as helping those categorising the image, it will help place the image in context and allow other users of the image (including academics) to make better use of the image :)
Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:52, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
File:Westerex08.PNG missing description details
[edit]
If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:59, 25 July 2010 (UTC)Thank you for uploading this media, It would be appreciated if you could add :
- 1-2 paragraphs explaining what is shown in the image.
- An explanation of how this image falls in the public domain.
As well as helping those categorising the image, it will help place the image in context and allow other users of the image (including academics) to make better use of the image :)
Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:59, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
== File:Westerex09.PNG missing description details ==
If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:04, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading this media, It would be appreciated if you could add :
- 1-2 paragraphs explaining what is shown in the image.
- An explanation of how this image falls in the public domain
As well as helping those categorising the image, it will help place the image in context and allow other users of the image (including academics) to make better use of the image :)
Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:04, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)