User talk:Komodo lover

Heatblast (ben 10)

A tag has been placed on Heatblast (ben 10), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Realkyhick 06:08, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Exo-skull.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Exo-skull.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:03, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Stinkarms.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Stinkarms.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:37, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your repeated reverts of my changes

Please do not revert my changes to your article. I was nominating it to be considered for deletion, which means that an administrator would review it and decide if it needs to be deleted. However, if you continue to remove deletion templates from your article, which is considered vandalism, you may be blocked from editing wikipedia. Additionally, your removal of my previous post on your user page is unacceptable. --Mars2035 15:30, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of goofs from Camp Lazlo speedy deletion

A tag has been placed on List of goofs from Camp Lazlo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as articles for deletion. If you can indicate how List of goofs from Camp Lazlo is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:List of goofs from Camp Lazlo saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. ArglebargleIV 15:41, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ban

Wikipedia is built on the consensus of the community, and behavior such as yours will not be tolerated. List of goofs from Camp Lazlo has been properly deleted a couple of times now and you insist on recreating it in the face of community agreement that it does not belong here. Your ban is extended, for a greater length than before. Denni ^talk 17:51, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Komodo lover (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason here

Decline reason:

No reason provided. — Metros232 11:49, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Komodo lover (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason here

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Komodo lover (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason here: I want to edit somore and I'll promise I'll never ever create list of goofs from Camp Lazlo again

Decline reason:

Unblock abuse. — Yamla 15:09, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of woodenpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Komodo lover for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 04:00, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note from Komodo lover

Dear fellow users, I Will not come back to this account because 1. I lost the password for it, 2. That name was stupid, 3. It's giving me a headache and 4. I could not wait for a month. Now, I'll continue creating more accounts untill you stop blocking me. I wasn't trying to mess up wikipedia, I was trying to help wikipedia and you must get rid of that note in the animal section in Zoo tycoon 2 Extinct animals, You are not allowed to be rude in wikipedia.

From the puppeteer, Komodo lover

P.S. Stopping creating accounts is a rule I cannot follow

P.S.S. This is another handpuppet. Note to komodo lover 16:35, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]