User talk:Komelbar

March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Homeopathy has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Will ^(talk) 14:41, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Homeopathy. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. You are creating POV edits that will be reverted. If you want to make significant changes, please take it to Talk:Homeopathy. OrangeMarlin ^{Talk• Contributions} 15:36, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Komelbar, your edits to Homeopathy article are repeating information already on the article and they also give undue weight to the arguments that the water memory is scientifically proved and that homeopathy has effects beyond placebo. Those studies should be down on the article, where the rest of articles are, since most studies show the opposite of those. Also, you are near to breaking the WP:3RR rule of not reverting 3 times on the same day the same article Ooops, orange is right, you had already broken it --Enric Naval (talk) 15:40, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Please don't delete paragraphs from the summary of the article (the paragraphs at the start of page, also called lead section or lead paragraph) just because they repeating information already present on the article. You see, the WP:LEAD lead section style guideline says that those paragraphs are supposed to "summarize the most important points" among other things, so they need to repeat the information in a resumed manner --Enric Naval (talk) 15:55, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Article probation notice

The article homeopathy, and related subjects, are under article probation. What that means is that any editor who behaves disruptively may be subjected to restrictions such as edit limitations or may even be blocked from editing. Please review this page for more guidance. You are currently edit-warring and have come up against the three-revert rule. Since your proposed edits clearly lack consensus, please discuss them on the article talk page rather than continuing to edit-war. If you continue reverting, you will be restricted from editing. Please consider the steps listed in dispute resolution rather than edit-warring. MastCell ^Talk 18:58, 5 March 2008 (UTC)