User talk:Komadj

December 2016

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Dodge Dart (PF) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 11:50, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Toyota Prius. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Toyota Prius was changed by Komadj (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.886644 on 2016-12-17T02:11:53+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:11, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Toyota 4Runner, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 16:27, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Plymouth Barracuda, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Plymouth Barracuda was changed by Komadj (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.959816 on 2016-12-17T16:31:44+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:31, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Crystal ball

Most of your edits conflict with the policy outlined in WP:CRYSTALBALL. Announcements of future events often turn out differently. Even when we keep them, each announcement must be backed up by a reference - otherwise we don;t know if it is a real announcement by the company or something you made up. Wikipedia is a global encyclopaedia - we must take care to use calendar years (most countries do not use US style model years that confusingly appear to be a year ahead of the calendar year) and also take care that changes in US market are not always reflected in the global market. Stepho talk 18:05, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Chrysler 200. Wikishovel (talk) 19:36, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Katie^talk 20:56, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Sausage Party— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:05, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Cars 3, you may be blocked from editing. Stikkyy (talk) 01:16, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Toyota Camry. Adam9007 (talk) 01:35, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

Adding references is how we ensure that content is valid. Without references, a reader can not easily validate information and there is no presumption of accuracy. wp:Original research or the use of your own knowledge must not be used on Wikipedia. See Help:Referencing for beginners and Help:footnotes. This is covered by the Wikipedia policy of wp:verifiability (WP:V). Please wp:cite your edits with wp:reliable sources (RS). Per WP:V unsourced content can be removed. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 23:31, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Katie^talk 01:45, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to Ferrari F12berlinetta

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Ferrari F12berlinetta, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 06:10, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:27, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

For this, this and especially this, where you add your guesses about the broadcast years, and speculate about the series being cancelled, treating Wikipedia like a rumor mill. Please stop adding unsourced content of any kind. It's not your job to analyze, speculate, editorialize, etc. Only content that you can attribute to reliable sources should be included. And this is a combination of unsourced content, speculation, and improper tone for an encyclopedia, like "if they could squeeze some room for another new Chrysler. Although the 200 seems to be dead for 2017." Or this. This is an academic reference, not a car blog. If you're not familiar with the proper professional tone an encyclopedia should be written in, you should look into that before you make another prose contribution. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:30, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rolls Royce Phantom VIII

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rolls Royce Phantom VIII, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:40, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of How To Train Your Dragon 3(2019) film

The article How To Train Your Dragon 3(2019) film has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not satisfy film notability. Unreleased films are seldom notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:41, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Dodge Durango

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Dodge Durango, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 07:43, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited to discuss Talk:Scooby-Doo#S.C.O.O.B_Retitling

Hi, per your recent edit I'd like to invite you to a discussion regarding the retitling of the movie here. Cheers, Katniss May the odds be ever in your favor ♥ 17:48, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve The Snow Queen 3: Fire and Ice

Hi, I'm Robertgombos. Komadj, thanks for creating The Snow Queen 3: Fire and Ice!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Added some categories and marked it as stub. Passing my review.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Robert G. (talk) 09:46, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Komadj. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Komadj. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]