User talk:Kokaynegeesus
July 2023
[edit]
Hello, I'm Bgsu98. I noticed that you recently removed content from Survivor 44 without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Bgsu98 (Talk) 00:23, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 17
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Timothée Chalamet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deadline. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
Welcome!
[edit]Hi Kokaynegeesus! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
The rule that affects you most as a new or IP editor is the prohibition on making any edit related to the Arab–Israel conflict unless you are logged into an account and that account is at least 30 days old and has made at least 500 edits.
This prohibition is broadly construed, so it includes edits such as adding the reaction of a public figure concerning the conflict to their article or noting the position of a company or organization as it relates to the conflict.
The exception to this rule is that you may request a specific change to an article on the talk page of that article or at this page. Please ensure that your requested edit complies with our neutral point of view and reliable sourcing policies, and if the edit is about a living person our policies on biographies of living people as well.
Any edits you make contrary to these rules are likely to be reverted, and repeated violations can lead to you being blocked from editing.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 22:32, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
[edit]
You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 22:32, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- If you continue to violate WP:ECR as you did here and here you will be blocked from editing. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 18:40, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Since it's been a while since your last warning and even the edits were a while ago I'm not going to ping ScottishFinnishRadish or take it further (although it's always possible they or some other admin will notice somehow and take action) but these are clear violations of ARBECR [1] [2] so I'm giving you another final warning. I note that the talk page edit was before the mainspace one so you should have been aware the hijacking of the Galaxy Leader was related to the Arab–Israeli conflict even if you didn't know the details. But in any case the talk page edit was itself a violation and if you had made the change to Hasan Piker and only later came to the talk page or otherwise became aware it was related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, you should have self-reverted if it was still possible. Nil Einne (talk) 11:38, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- Just to note that even if someone else is violating ARBECR, it doesn't allow you to do so. So if an IP posts something about the Arab–Israeli conflict, it doesn't mean it's okay for you to respond. You shouldn't even do so even if it's to warn them about ARBECR or inform admins about it although there would be less concern if that was all you did. Nil Einne (talk) 12:37, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- lol y'all are obsessed with Hasan. Kokaynegeesus (talk) 21:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Since it's been a while since your last warning and even the edits were a while ago I'm not going to ping ScottishFinnishRadish or take it further (although it's always possible they or some other admin will notice somehow and take action) but these are clear violations of ARBECR [1] [2] so I'm giving you another final warning. I note that the talk page edit was before the mainspace one so you should have been aware the hijacking of the Galaxy Leader was related to the Arab–Israeli conflict even if you didn't know the details. But in any case the talk page edit was itself a violation and if you had made the change to Hasan Piker and only later came to the talk page or otherwise became aware it was related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, you should have self-reverted if it was still possible. Nil Einne (talk) 11:38, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)