User talk:Kojakkrags

Kojakkrags, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Kojakkrags! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

22:02, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

pashtun people

1.why are you replacing afghanistan with durrani empire...durrani empire no longer exist but afghanistan still does. Im adding people on modern day achievements....not something that is history. and durrani empire was not the only powerful pashtun empire 2. yes there are many notable pashtuns from pakistan like imran khan. Saadkhan12345 (talk) 23:18, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I gave a valid reason...it is common knowledge that the Durrani Empire was a very powerful Pashtun empire, it covered both Afghanistan and what is now Pakistan. Name another Pashtun empire that was more powerful than the Durrani empire. Then why are you removing today's popular world leaders (Hamid Karzai and Ashraf Ghani)? Pakistan's current government has no notable Pashtuns. Imran Khan's ethnicity is questionable, just because he has a Khan last name doesn't make him Pashtun. There has to be a source that explicitly states he is Pashtun, just like Karzai and Ghani. Kojakkrags (talk) 16:44, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I asked why are you adding historical achievements in lead section? there are more afghan pashtun kings but the reason why ahmed shah durani is written is because hes done something that still visible today. Imran khan is pashtun. if you click on his page you see it all well sourced and referenced.

Your English is weak, I can't understand what you're saying. Pakistan was created in 1947 but Pashtuns existed for 100s of years (as Afghans). This article is about them. The lead suppose to mention notable Pashtuns, regardless if they existed 100s of years ago. The whole world knows that Imran Khan is not really a Pashtun. You have to show convincing evidence to the contrary. Is there evidence that he speaks Pashto or his father being Pashtun? There is nothing in the entire internet. Kojakkrags (talk) 14:09, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

i didnt say that the lead should not have pashtuns. you said there nothing in the entire internet but if you CLICK ON HIS PAGE you will see it.

Check here Family of Imran Khan Saadkhan12345 (talk) 03:42, 27 May 201

Everything on the internet says he, his parents, grandparents, and even great-grand parents, are Punjabis. The whole world knows he is not Pashtun but a Punjabi. Anyway, why you keep arguing over this? I didn't remove his name or picture. Kojakkrags (talk) 04:14, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Omg can you not read? read what the reference words says"The family are ethnically of Pashtun origin. Paternally, Khan belongs to the Niazi Pashtun tribe which has long been settled in Mianwali in northwestern Punjab.[2] Khan's mother hailed from the Burki Pashtun tribe settled in Jalandhar (Punjab), which had emigrated a few centuries ago from South Waziristan in the tribal areas of northwest Pakistan. Saadkhan12345 (talk) 10:37, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Are you Imran Khan? I asked this because you are extremely defensive. I read everything, no source mention him being Pashtun. There is only an old picture of him sitting with tribale people, that means nothing. Everybody knows there are NON-Pashtuns in the tribal areas. Kojakkrags (talk) 16:05, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Note that Wikipedia articles are not reliable sources and should not be used as evidence for anything. So you can't use Family of Imran Khan as support Imran Khan's ethnicity. However, neither is "the whole world knows" a valid argument. You must find reliable independent sources (which also excludes books written by Imran Khan) for any claim that is contested. --regentspark (comment) 20:21, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In regards to your comment, Imran Khan not being Pashtun is a general understanding among all those who know him. This is discussed and argued by many people all over the internet. Even he never claimed to be Pashtun, he only said his ancestors are from the tribal region. Despite all of this, I didn't remove him from the article. Moreover, I didn't down play Pakistani Pashtuns, in fact, I was the one who actually added proven Pakistani Pashtuns in the introduction of that article, and also added an image of Malala Yousafzai (Pakistani Pashtun) in the other subsection. Why would I do that if I was downplaying Pakistani Pashtuns? This shows you're wrong about me.Kojakkrags (talk) 16:09, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administratonrs may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.--regentspark (comment) 11:42, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kojakkrags (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This block is unjustified. I didn't violate Wikipedia. Am I blocked because of my possible race, nationality, ethnicity, or religion? To block civilized editors based on these grounds is the most evil thing in Wikipedia. There are two people in my house who edit Wikipedia articles, both are very mature and would not violate Wikipedia. We had no idea that two people cannot create Wikipedia account. I didn't even get a warning.Kojakkrags (talk) 15:27, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed sockpuppetry. There's no doubt here, a clear violation of WP:SOCK and WP:BLOCK. Why you'd think this has anything to do with your race, nationality, ethnicity, or religion is beyond me. This information is literally not available, unless you choose to publish it. And I see no evidence you have. Yamla (talk) 16:11, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

User:Yamla, everything at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Lagoo_sab is talking about my ethnicity and nationality. I'm a Pakistani Pashtun, obviously my religion is Islam. Had I been editing articles about flowers, cars, fruits, or other such things then I wouldn't have complained about race, nationality, religion or ethnicity. You accuse me but I didn't violate WP:SOCK and WP:BLOCK. I'm using one account for proper purposes.Kojakkrags (talk) 16:26, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Neither your ethnicity nor your nationality is mentioned there, not once, only the topic areas you focus on. It is not the case you are using one account. We know that for a fact. KrakatoaKatie (talk · contribs) investigated the technical evidence and found you were indeed using more than one account. --Yamla (talk) 17:25, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I was targeted and reported by LouisAragon (talk · contribs) simply because I edited Pashtun related articles. LouisAragon is clearly an anti Pashtun POV pusher. [1] As a matter of fact, LouisAragon is this Kabuli Tajik who've been obsessed with Lagoo_sab for many years. He's pretending to be someone else. [2] He refuses to recognize a historical fact that eastern Iran was ruled by Pashtun Hotak dynasty and Pashtun Durrani dynasty, and what is now western Bangladesh was ruled by Pashtun Sur dynasty. To him, this is only "wishful" thinking. [3] That's the common mind of Tajiks. Everything he mentioned in the report is about my nationality and ethnicity. He does not and cannot show me violating Wikipedia. Many Wikipedia editors (including LouisAragon) have two accounts but they're not blocked so why am I so special? Tummywink is a legitimate alternative account of someone other than me, it made a few edits in about 5 articles. I'm a mind reader, I already know no mater what I say I won't be unblocked but I have the right to defend myself.Kojakkrags (talk) 18:09, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

why is he banned when he says he didnt know two people can create wiki account? Saadkhan12345 (talk) 21:21, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]