User talk:Kodster/Archives/2008/April

Articles

Check this.--andreasegde (talk) 11:04, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Hard Day's Night

I have reviewed the article, it needs improvement but the bones are there, if you can resolve some issues it is defo worthy of a GA states. It you would like me to citation tag the article let me know. Realist2 (talk) 07:27, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Another GA nomination

[1] - its not an official review, its just my opinion. Realist2 (talk) 19:38, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Sure ill help any way i can, im no expert on the beatles but structure, format etc I can defo help you with. Thing is if i help too much i cant review it . ;-0 Realist2 (talk) 19:45, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

A Hard Day's Night (film)

I don't understand your comment at the Talk page. However, I've started recasting the article to WP:GA standards, and maybe better. Lot more references, those unreferenced deleted. P.S. you should look at the history of the talk page to see User:Realist2's previous comment to me. I should have it all finished by this time tomorrow, when I will invite comment before requesting Realist2 to resume his GA review. Thanks. --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 19:30, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Rodhullandemu your personal issues with me have never gone away ever since that beatles incident, i am trying to turn over a new leaf and issues with the other beatles editors are in the past. I ask you to give me the same second chance they were prepared to give instead of going behind my back. How unprofessional of an admin. Realist2 (talk) 19:38, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Look, this is all MY fault, not Rodhullandemu or yours. So take the blame on me, I'm the one that put a comment that Rodhullandemu didn't understand. Okay? So I give to you my apologies. Thank you. I'm putting this message on your page so that YOU are aware of this. Okay? Okay. :) Kodster (Willis) (Look what I can do) 19:42, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

I dont care i have no issue with you, im tired of being be littled by this admin, how unprofessional to treat an impartial reviewer. Realist2 (talk) 19:45, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Well im not happy with how ive been treated, you asked me to review your article and despite the fact i had only just been up for nomination i reviewed it ahead of other articles, ive passed 2 beatles articles in 3 days, all of a sudden i cant be trusted to make an impartial decision. Looks like some dont forgive or apologise quickly. Still everything is cool with you and this is not your fault, i often find admins to be stuck in their ways. Realist2 (talk) 19:58, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

• Hi Kodster, I've more or less finished with looking at this. Just need to get some refs for the various releases. Do you want to take a look at it before I let Realist2 know his review can come off hold, or do you want to leave it till later for other to comment? Cheers. --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 12:56, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Hey is this article ready for review yet, it hasnt been edited in a while, rodhulland hasnt said anything specifically? Realist2 (talk) 16:41, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

The article is GA now, hope i was a help. Realist2 (talk) 20:30, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Refs

OH now matey, one step at a time, i omly just got the hang of this method!!!! ;-) Realist2 (talk) 17:19, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

GAs

Any future Beatles' GAs (and I'm sure there will be a lot) should be put on this list. Thanks.--andreasegde (talk) 20:46, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Thriller

That would really help, we are sorting through the language and formatting the citations. You have a lot on you plate already though so dont over streach yourself. ;-) Realist2 (talk) 16:33, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

People always mess around with that sentance, feel free to clarify it. Remember its not his second solo album, its his second solo album in collaboration with quincy jones. Ill review the article ASAP, im just going to make a hot drink. Realist2 (talk) 16:53, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Cheers, if you board and can do any citation formatts it would be appreciated, there are so many to do and ive only just learnt so im really slow, im reviewing that article now, its V GOOD!!!!! Realist2 (talk) 17:56, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Ha, no i cant review "Thriller" I wrote half of it. If you want to review it please do!! Tell me where it needs to be improved and put it on hold, im aware it cant pass straight away. ;-) Realist2 (talk) 18:10, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for taking a look, im starting to cut through your list, the main issue is citation formatting as well. Realist2 (talk) 22:57, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Regarding the rocording and release section, its so small, maybe it should just be deleted or stuck in the lead.? Realist2 (talk) 17:49, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

I noticed you mentioned singles in the lead, i like it, but i dont think we should use those singles as examples. Those music videos are already mentioned 2 lines below. Why not do different singles, mix it up a little, the girl is mine, wanna be startin somethin and human nature? Realist2 (talk) 18:51, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Ok , i reverted myself, i agree it is nearly done, we just need to finish the "recording and release" section and formatt those sources. The article cant be awarded GA until every damn one of those soucres is formatted. It'l will be a pain but its worth it. Realist2 (talk) 19:50, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Ok ill go and do some reading and jot some stuff down on paper, even though im a diehard fan im a little rusty on the thriller era, its actually not my favourite jackson album. Ill get to it. Realist2 (talk) 19:56, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Ok ive got some neat stuff, ill put it up in bullet point form on the talk page, take about 15 mins. Realist2 (talk) 20:10, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

I'll do it but i would appreciate if you mop up my errors when im done. ;-) Realist2 (talk) 21:28, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Ok ive done that section now, what do you think, ill add the sources once you give me feedback. Realist2 (talk) 21:51, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

I thought you were american? I didnt think they drank tea. Odd Realist2 (talk) 22:16, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

They made 300 songs for the album then picked the best 9. Realist2 (talk) 22:18, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

I can carry on reading, i actually only have one book on jackson, others arent worth buying in you want neutral facts. Most either paint him as a god or the devil, the one book i have is like the only truely respected book about the guy. Realist2 (talk) 22:32, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Ok ive added another 4 little points to the talk page. Hopefully you can get it into the paragraph so that it flows, but thats it im all outa info. Realist2 (talk) 22:52, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Yeah shifting means selling. ;-0 Realist2 (talk) 23:17, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

I replied at my page accidently. Take a look. Realist2 (talk) 23:31, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Its actually getting closer to FA now. But citation formatting is a requirement of both awards. It could be perfect in very imaginable way but if the sources aint formatted it cant even get a GA. Someone realy needs to change that rule. In my opinion citation formatting should only be a requirement of FA. Realist2 (talk) 23:39, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

OK ive formatted every source now, i think its ready to review, oh my head hurts. :-( Realist2 (talk) 07:53, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Hey neat job their with that book source. Realist2 (talk) 21:07, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Its great, news i have to update the wikiproject, i aint been their in ages!!!! I think an FA review is in order soon, i might relax a little first though. Realist2 (talk) 21:21, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Ah yes, ill give that a twirl later tonight, gives me an excuse to reach my 8000th edit!!! Wow ive done so much on wiki lately. Realist2 (talk) 21:27, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Also i think you should review a lot more often, just remember, when you pass or fail an article remember to take it off the nomination bpard list as well, dont worry i did it for you though. Whats your next wiki conquest? Realist2 (talk) 21:43, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Yeah ill do it tonight i swear, ive got to do a really pesky thing with thriller at the moment, it a look at my thriller edits you will see what i mean. Realist2 (talk) 00:39, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Can you take it off peer review, it cant be on FA and peer review at the same time, yikes. Realist2 (talk) 01:07, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Cheers, im not sure how to resolve this though. Realist2 (talk) 01:15, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Hey buddy, you really have to close down that link above, otherwise it cant ever be an FA article. Realist2 (talk) 03:31, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Aside from the stuff above, ive citation tagged your article for you, its actually not terribly undersourced, it looks worse than it actually is, i added about 15 tags. The real issue with it is pov, unprofessional language and length. Its way too long, some of it is unnessary, like the alternative versions section, its just not needed. Some1 will prob remove my tags tho so keep an eye on it. ;-) Realist2 (talk) 11:01, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Yeah i think its closed so all is ok, its not problem, i only found out about the rule myself yesterday when i was reading the rules for FA nomination. Ive tagged your article for you, when you finish that let me know and ill give you more pointers. Realist2 (talk) 22:12, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Yes im goning to get thriller up to FA and make my leave, ive become somewhat disenchanted with wiki and how it treats its exstablished contributers like rubbish. Realist2 (talk) 20:16, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

I just removed the nomination, it needs a good copy edit, something i cannot give it. Realist2 (talk) 20:56, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Thriller

I need your input, could you look at the Thriller talk page. Realist2 (talk) 20:26, 13 April 2008 (UTC) And its still selling, who knows what might happen, there might be more promotion to destoy it now would be madness. Realist2 (talk) 20:32, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

WP:AWB

Hi Kodster. Although you've got 800+ edits, only 312 are to Mainspace, so I can't approve you just yet. At this rate, however, it won't be long. Cheers. --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 20:52, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Thriller 25

The seperation took place, i have also put Thriller 25 up for GA. Thanx for your support. Realist2 (talk) 08:17, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

A day in the life

I apologize for any inconveniences I may have caused. In hindsight, identifying the rollback as AGF would have been better. Sorry again! archanamiya · talk 21:15, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

No. I'm saying I should have assumed good faith. archanamiya · talk 21:22, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Actually, my username means Superior inner personality if translated literally. archanamiya · talk 15:01, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

From the English words Arch, and anima. archanamiya · talk 15:05, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

What do you mean, the wiki links? Realist2 (talk) 23:01, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Mighty Crestville

I'll give it a read through after work tomorrow. One appreciates your reverence. Indeed, it is justly deserved, but appreciated never the less :)--Crestville (talk) 16:05, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Ugh, sorry, I've been either K.O. from work of at my girlfriends. I promise I'll get around to it. Keep reminding me! From what I've seen, the content is perfectly sound, just the grammar, syntax etc. needs working on. I'll can try and have a crack at that over the weekend if you like?--Crestville (talk) 21:50, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

I almost feel like apologising because I've read through it a couple of times and really can't see how I could add to it. I think it's a really good article. It may deserve a section on the influence the track has had on pop music, but other than that I'm not sure. If I can find my ever-elusive copy of revolution in the head I could do a bit of work on the song structure section, but other than that I think it's great and you should be commended. If you're still having trouble, why not put it up for peer review?--Crestville (talk) 16:17, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Just sorry I can't be more help :)--Crestville (talk) 00:06, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Sure, I'll take a look - but if Cresty can't help I'm not sure I'll do any better.... hiya Joe Tvoz |talk 02:18, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

I did a run-through for MOS stuff like quote style and punctuation - also did some rewording here and there. More citations would be good, and Crestville's suggestion of a section on the impact on popular culture also a good thought. Hope this helps. Tvoz |talk 08:27, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Hum

Hum i might just hang on in long enough to help you. I still owe my friends a few favours before i depart. Realist2 (talk) 20:57, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Hey, i made a list on the talk page, once you done that list i might suggest putting the article ack up for GA. Realist2 (talk) 18:34, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Yeak you done a good job of those sources, im impressed, ive only just got the hang of that, you make it look easy. Let me know when you've finished my list, if you dont understand or object to an issue. Realist2 (talk) 21:06, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Cheers. Realist2 (talk) 23:14, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

GA

Yeah i think so, even if it goes on hold, you can make all the needed corrections in the week limit. Realist2 (talk) 01:21, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Laughing Baby

I have nominated Laughing Baby, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laughing Baby. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Ecoleetage (talk) 01:37, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

GA fail for Aerosmith

I saw that you failed the Aerosmith article. I really think it would have been more advisable to put the article on hold instead, since what you are suggesting really only requires moving a few things around and not really seeking out any new information. I think it can easily be done in a week. But whatever, if it takes two weeks instead of one to get this article GA'd, so be it.

I understand your concerns with the lead, and will try to shorten down and summarize up the general gist of the band's rise-fall-comeback history in a paragraph without all the nitty-gritty details.

As far as an awards section, a separate article already exists (List of Aerosmith awards and achievements), which is found in the "See Also" section as well as the template. Is this acceptable? Our concern was that we didn't want the article to be too excessively long, by having multiple sections.

As far as separate sections on the band's singles, albums, and tours, these also have articles (Aerosmith discography, Aerosmith singles discography, Aerosmith concert tours). Or, I think what you're getting at, is instead of having sections like 1970s, 1980s, etc., you'd prefer to break it down like 1971-1974, 1975-1979, 1980-1984, etc. Is that correct? Please clarify.

Other than that, I'm glad the article meets all the other criteria. I'm just looking for some clarification before I go improving the article, so that way this article doesn't get failed three times because I misunderstood you. Abog (talk) 07:20, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Lyrics.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Lyrics.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NotifyBot (talk) 15:31, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

A Day in the Life

FYI, I was going to peer review A Day in the Life, but will not as long as it has an {{in use}} template on it. I left this on the PR too, but as there has been no response there, thought I'd let you know. Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 15:31, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Lol, im saying your being unnessarily causious. I think you have GA in the bag. ;-) Realist2 (talk) 23:59, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Yeah , ive made some corrections and left a few questions. Nothing too meaty. Realist2 (talk) 00:11, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

here is the source. and here is the quote, "No I haven't really thought about it in that way but I would give it more thought. We haven't really discussed it yet, on that level, but I'm sure at some point we will. But it's a great thought." What you think? Realist2 (talk) 01:13, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

OOPS i never follow the headings anymore, tusk tusk. Realist2 (talk) 01:20, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Done. Realist2 (talk) 01:46, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Sure id love to know what you think. Im done adding to it for now. Realist2 (talk) 19:39, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

No im happy with it, im not gonna push it for FA at the moment, im gunna PUT Thriller back up for FA soon and Michael Jackson is currently on FA. My hands are full Realist2 (talk) 19:46, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Michael Jackson

Hi there i put the Michael Jackson article up for FA, ive resolved everyones issues to date. Would you mind putting your input/advise/opposition/ensorsement. Cheers. Realist2 (talk) 18:50, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Hey great work , keep it up, i had to remove the in use tag as it damages the stability critera and might make people oppose FA. Your just gonna have to prey for no edit conflicts. Yikes. Realist2 (talk) 20:41, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Thankyou, thankyou very much, i would like other books done in the same way the magic and the madness is. I was advised in the FA to has the book formatted like that so i think we should keep it that way and do the same thing for other books. Thankyou for your efforts. Realist2 (talk) 21:33, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Yeah its great!! Is there any more formatting to do? Im getting excited now, its looking good. Realist2 (talk) 21:55, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

		The Copyeditor's Barnstar
		For your amazing work on the Michael Jackson article, spending time cleaning up an article that is of no interest to you. Well done Realist2 (talk) 22:23, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

It looks good, do you think its FA endorsable? Realist2 (talk) 22:37, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Janet Jackson

Thankyou for the copy-editing. Bookkeeperoftheoccult (talk) 03:03, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

done templates on peer reviews

Hi. I removed the  Done template you used at the Thriller album Peer review. Per "How to respond to a request" at WP:PR, the templates shouldn't be used, as the graphics can slow the loading time down at the PR page when transcluded. Regards! -- ṃ•α•Ł•ṭ•ʰ•Ə•Щ• @ 05:06, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Stray On hold template on GAN

Hi. On the GAN Music listing you left an "On hold" template under the nomination Wagner's Rhinemaidens. I think this related to a delisted article Thriller 25. Anyway, I am removing it as it is preventing a review of the Wagner article. Brianboulton (talk) 10:06, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Re: Status Bot

Hi! I don't think you meant to do that! Try adding a new section at User talk:StatusBot instead. And you might want to ask an admin to delete the new mainspace you've just created. Philip Trueman (talk) 14:32, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

A Day in the Life

All over it. I have to get to Aeneas Mackintosh first though. Funny, I am at work and listening to Ticket to Ride. I'll either get to it tonight during some down time or when I get home in the morning. IvoShandor (talk) 04:59, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

I bumped you up on my list due to the length of your previous wait. Copy edit done, I also made a number of comments on the peer review as I went, some of them were copy editing issues that require your input others were just general comments and issues. IvoShandor (talk) 18:16, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Name alterations

Hey i want to change the colours of my user name. Can you help. Cheers. Realist2 (talk) 18:18, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

What you think? I only have the colours red, green, and blue, i dont like red so this is all i could do. Where are there more colours? Anyway take a look. --Realist2 (talk) 20:57, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

HEY --Realist2 (talk) 21:00, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

I was clever, notice how i bolded the number 2. I still want the number 2 to stand out more. Im sure the correct colours will help. Dont want to use red though. Realist2 (talk) 21:05, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Look at me now. Realist² ('Come Speak To Me') 01:52, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

You guys are having fun. Keep up the work... :) --Sand, deckchair and sun (talk) 10:01, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

We are indeed my friend, Kodster as usual any help is good help. Id be particulary greatful if you can do the same to Thriller as you did MJ. It was really helpful and i think its starting slowely but surely to sway people in support of FA.Realist² ('Come Speak To Me') 16:30, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Cheers, the more help the better, on a side note, how is you GA nomination going, had any feedback? Realist² ('Come Speak To Me') 17:24, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Yeah you can do it for Thriller as it isnt on FA. Go right ahead if you wish. Realist² ('Come Speak To Me') 17:28, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Yean sorry, i user british spelling, also i adjusted a paragraph because maybe it didnt make sense to you the first time around. Realist² ('Come Speak To Me') 18:37, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Its a list of countries where it went to #1, but for argentina and new zealand ive also managed to slip in sales figures in brackets. Realist² ('Come Speak To Me') 18:43, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

I took some words out, should clear it up. Realist² ('Come Speak To Me') 18:45, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Cool, at least thats sorted, MJ is going good, ive resolved the issues of all 4 people who have commented and the article has 1 vote in support of FA with zero opposes. It stands a hell of a chance, fingers crossed, just waiting now to hear more. Realist² ('Come Speak To Me') 18:50, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Im glad to hear, youve become quiet knowledgable on the topic with the MJ related reviews you have done. You should even add that to your reasoning if you havent already, you have more experience than most on reviewing MJ related articles. Realist² ('Come Speak To Me') 18:59, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi kodster, could you give the Janet Jackson article a copy edit, another user needs a hand on it, its nearly at FA. Ive seen the work you do and i leave it in your capable hands if you so wish. Cheers. Realist² ('Come Speak To Me') 00:42, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Wow, quick response, your not usually on this sorta time. Realist² ('Come Speak To Me') 00:49, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

GREAT work, keep at it!!! My Thriller peer review just filled up, its nothing hard, mostly fiddly bits, ill start at it in the evening im in uni today. Realist² ('Come Speak To Me') 02:26, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

3.30 AM. Lol, i always edit this late. Realist² ('Come Speak To Me') 02:38, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Your mad ;-) , im very tired now but i have an essay to write. Im watching from a distance. Realist² ('Come Speak To Me') 02:47, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Lol, i took it when i first started, trust me i dont need no test to tell me im addicted. Realist² ('Come Speak To Me') 03:00, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Night. Realist² ('Come Speak To Me') 03:24, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

I found this funny: fjadsk;ifklda;youajksarejakldsareadingjfakl;thisjk;,jkl;youajarejkalajklgoodjkl;ajreader. --Efe (talk) 03:29, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Yah. that reader makes your "gibberish" intelligible. haha. --Efe (talk) 01:25, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi there, i need your assistance asap, the FA for MJ looks good, 6 supports 2 oppose, the article needs a really good copy edit, could you give it another strong look, read the review to get points on what those who oppose are looking for. Cheers. Realist² ('Come Speak To Me') 19:33, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Back cover.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Back cover.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:26, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

A day in the life

The article passed GA. Where are you anyways? Realist² ('Come Speak To Me') 17:10, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Great, i was worried, thought you wouldnt return. Realist² ('Come Speak To Me') 21:58, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Make sure its been added to the beatles wiki project as GA now. Looking at its walk page it doesnt seem to be added. Also could you give MJ another extensive copy edit when possible, particularly grammer. Cheers Realist² ('Come Speak To Me') 16:00, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

I took Thriller off before you went away, i took MJ off the other day because it still needs that copy edit. Thriller is almost ready to go on again. Realist² ('Come Speak To Me') 19:51, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

It should read that its a michael jackson song that later featured on the 2001 reissue of thriller. Cheers. Realist² ('Come Speak To Me') 20:22, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, i would like you to continue the MJ copy edit. Im confused, the last time you were on you said you had completed the career section yet? Realist² ('Come Speak To Me') 21:37, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Everything in the career section below Thriller is ok?, when i looked at your edit, it looks like you didnt get below the Thriller era. Im doing a review right now ;-( Realist² ('Come Speak To Me') 21:56, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

He he, its good. Realist² ('Come Speak To Me') 22:16, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Also, i noticed you got the islamic barnstar as well, lol i chuckled over that so much. How random indeed. Realist² ('Come Speak To Me') 22:21, 28 April 2008 (UTC)