User talk:Kododendron/sandbox

Peer Review

I was not assigned to your article, but the person I was assigned to did not make any edits yet and I noticed you had made some, so you might end up get two peer reviews. :)

Regarding the lead of the Androgyny, I think it's really good! It gives readers an idea of what androgyny is. I also think it's great that it mentions intersexuals, NB people, genderqueer people, and gender neutral people. I think the order of the sections could be improved by putting etymology at the bottom with symbols underneath it. I think the history section should be the first in the article as it explains the most. I think the physical traits section needs to be longer or merged with another section, it just seems too short and breaks up the flow of the page in my opinion. I think the article is very fair and neutral. I think the sources used are good as well. I like the variety of pictures used, and I honestly think the article does not need to be improved much aside from the few changed listed. I really like this sentence from the lead "The different meanings of androgyny point to the complex interrelationship between aspects of sex, gender, and sexuality.". Good job, and keep it up!

MollzMayes (talk) 01:12, 17 March 2019 (UTC)MollzMayes