User talk:Kobi41

Welcome!

Hello, Kobi41, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Ali Khaliqi, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Ethanlu121 (talk) 13:55, 14 February 2017 (UTC) Ethanlu121Ali Khaliqi was not promotional page it was only introduction profile of great artist who designed largest carpets of the world,please turn this page back,he is professor of different universities and very busy for ads or promotional messages. please confirm the page. thank you for advance (Kobi41 (talk) 14:25, 14 February 2017 (UTC))[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ali Khaliqi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ali Khaliqi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Ethanlu121 (talk) 13:55, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Ali Khaliqi. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Ethanlu121 (talk) 13:56, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ethanlu121 this is not advertising of some body or something it's only data of an Artist who is designed Large scale carpets that's Register in guinness (Kobi41 (talk) 14:00, 14 February 2017 (UTC))[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Somi60bay, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Cabayi (talk) 14:08, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cabayi Excuse me I don't get , this is my own account and I don't have any other accounts. (Kobi41 (talk) 14:21, 14 February 2017 (UTC))[reply]

Then it is a truly remarkable coincidence that you recreated an article last created yesterday by another user who was blocked yesterday. The box above tells you how to respond to the investigation. Please present your arguments and evidence as it indicates. Cabayi (talk) 14:25, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Ethanlu121. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. If you want to tell me something, please create a seperate section for it, instead of defacing previous messages I have recieved. Ethanlu121 (talk) 14:30, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ali khaliqi (February 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not satisfying our simplest policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Kobi41/sandbox/ali khaliqi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 21:14, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

hello. the source that I used are the main pages of mosques in wikipedia, books and lots of news!!! so what shall I add more

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kobi41 (talk) 21:23, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

hello. the source that I used are the main pages of mosques in wikipedia, books and lots of news!!! so what shall I add more

Request on 21:52:27, 14 February 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Kobi41

Kobi41 (talk · contribs)
- User:Kobi41 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I need to know what shall fix or rebuilt exactly? ( Kobi41 (talk) 21:52, 14 February 2017 (UTC) )[reply]

Kobi41 (talk) 21:52, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kobi41 (talk) 07:21, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sorry what was your decline reasons? what shall I change? (Kobi41 (talk) 07:21, 15 February 2017 (UTC)).[reply]