User talk:Kobbra

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

You have received these suggestions because we are currently running a study to see if SuggestBot is helpful for newly registered Wikipedia editors. Normally SuggestBot only makes suggestions for users who ask for them explicitly on the SuggestBot request page. We will not post suggestions on your talk page again unless you ask for them. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find a complete consent form with contact information on the SuggestBot Study page.

Stubs: Ministry of Regional Development and Tourism (Romania); Sayoko Yamaguchi; 'Til Death Do We Part; McKinney North High School; Podgoria; Battle of the Smala; Ministry of Economy, Commerce and Business Environment (Romania); Vasile Blaga; EFA (mobile bridge); Nicolae Teodorescu; Beceni; Sibiu Stock Exchange; Ciolanu Monastery; Gura Teghii; Military tradition; Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (Romania); Lucas Babin; Calvini; George Maior

Cleanup: Music of Romania; Folklore of Romania; Air Force Instruction
Merge: Anyu Angelov; Romanian War of Independence; Field artillery
Add Sources: List of Romanian actors; Anghel Saligny Bridge; Berca Mud Volcanoes
Wikify: Project Phoenix (South Africa); Social structure of Romania; Flora of Romania
Expand: List of members of the Holy Synod of the Romanian Orthodox Church; Romanian Principalities; Science and technology in Romania

SuggestBot picks the articles you might be interested in based on the articles you've edited and using a number of different techniques: following links from them to other articles, matching articles based on their content, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedia users. It tries to recommend only articles that others have marked as needing work, such as stub articles that need to be made longer, clean-up articles that need writing help, and so on. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you choose to participate we encourage you to leave feedback on these suggestions, which you can most easily do here by editing your user talk page. We'll stop by later to read them.

Regards, Nettrom (talk), project researcher and SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:54, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Victor Ciutacu

The article Victor Ciutacu has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Favonian (talk) 20:55, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Victor Ciutacu

I have nominated Victor Ciutacu, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victor Ciutacu. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Favonian (talk) 19:37, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Victor Ciutacu. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 11:22, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Victor Ciutacu, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Favonian (talk) 17:08, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of sourced content

Please don't removed sourced information from articles as you did with this edit to Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides. First of all your rationale is flawed. Just because we have one source for both figures doesn't mean that the other is not required, especially when it gives a different figure. Secondly, there is no proof that Box Office Mojo is correct and Variety is wrong. Unless the information is released by Disney or the producers then there is no way of knowing whose estimate is closest. I've seen estimates of $175 million and $200 million, so a budget range best reflects the span of estimates. Wikipedia's neutral point of view states that we should include "all significant views that have been published by reliable sources", which in this case means we should include all budget estimates published by reliable sources. Hopefully now this has been explained, you won't be removing the sourced content again. If you have a good reason why the Variety is estimate is wrong, such as a quote from the producer, then please raise the issue on the talk page first. Betty Logan (talk) 16:02, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]