User talk:Knvrajesh

March 2019

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Conference call. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. KH-1 (talk) 07:35, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

COI

You have an obvious conflict of interest and you must declare it. If you work directly or indirectly for an organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. If you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Knvrajesh. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Knvrajesh|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message.

Also read the following regarding writing an article

you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls

you must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic.
there shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
you must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. You must also reply to the COI request above

Thanks for your email. You should not be trying to spam your company here, I've given you all the guidance you need above Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:26, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Knvrajesh, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Knvrajesh! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

Thanks alot Teahouse please guide me how to join knvrajesh (talk) 10:24, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rajesh Kollapudi (March 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by FR30799386 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please provide atleast 3 reliable third party sources which have covered him

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rajesh Kollapudi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rajesh Kollapudi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

<< FR ^(mobileUndo) 08:07, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rajesh Kollapudi (March 18)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reasons left by StraussInTheHouse were: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. This topic is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

SITH (talk) 09:40, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Teleconference, you may be blocked from editing. Cahk (talk) 09:04, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Mean as custard (talk) 09:46, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Satya Kalyan Yerramsetti

Hi, I have moved this page to Draft:Satya Kalyan Yerramsetti so you and others have a chance to turn it into a wikipedia article. Currently it reads like a CV. Ϣere SpielChequers 11:54, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DMacks (talk) 18:19, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is the same COI problem mentioned several months ago, and also problems of copyvio here and on commons. DMacks (talk) 18:20, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DMacks{{unblock reviewed|1=I'm here to update the pages i know them by adding images & social Links i'm new to wiki since march i'm trying to add good content & not for promoting any such kind|decline=You may be new, but your behavior has continued to be a problem from the start. You were still editting page(s) related to the company/product for which you have an apparent COI. You were warned that our Terms of Service have an absolute requirement to loudly announce your relevant affiliations, among other important information about how to edit any pages related to them. I received an email from you, and do not plan to respond by email, but am open to discussing here on your talkpage. I am only one of multiple editors who have commented and dealt with your edits, so I do not feel comfortable keeping them out of the loop. still no one is giving me a chance to learn wikipedia or giving me information on it, i rather gets warning or account blocked, i request DMacks please unblock my account

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Knvrajesh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm here to update the pages i know them by adding images & social Links i'm new to wiki since march i'm trying to add good content & not for promoting any such kind

Decline reason:

You may be new, but your behavior has continued to be a problem from the start. You were still editting page(s) related to the company/product for which you have an apparent COI. You were warned that our Terms of Service have an absolute requirement to loudly announce your relevant affiliations, among other important information about how to edit any pages related to them. I received an email from you, and do not plan to respond by email, but am open to discussing here on your talkpage. I am only one of multiple editors who have commented and dealt with your edits, so I do not feel comfortable keeping them out of the loop. DMacks (talk) 03:14, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Knvrajesh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #25679 was submitted on Jun 21, 2019 20:38:35. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 20:38, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DMacks{{unblock reviewed|1=I'm here to update the pages i know them by adding images & social Links i'm new to wiki since march i'm trying to add good content & not for promoting any such kind|decline=You may be new, but your behavior has continued to be a problem from the start. You were still editting page(s) related to the company/product for which you have an apparent COI. You were warned that our Terms of Service have an absolute requirement to loudly announce your relevant affiliations, among other important information about how to edit any pages related to them. I received an email from you, and do not plan to respond by email, but am open to discussing here on your talkpage. I am only one of multiple editors who have commented and dealt with your edits, so I do not feel comfortable keeping them out of the loop. still no one is giving me a chance to learn wikipedia or giving me information on it, i rather gets warning or account blocked, i request DMacks please unblock my account

Draft:Rajesh Kollapudi concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Rajesh Kollapudi, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Rajesh Kollapudi

Hello, Knvrajesh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rajesh Kollapudi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! HasteurBot (talk) 09:00, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]