User talk:Knowledgekid666

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cow cleaner 5000, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

KATMAKROFAN (talk) 00:01, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Someguy1221: Can you also nuke the user's 'tribs. Thanx, - Mlpearc (open channel) 00:12, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Eddit summary

Can you explain this edit summary ? not sure what you're trying to say. Thanx - Mlpearc (open channel) 00:07, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Revdel request

Avraham, Daniel Case, DoRD, Dweller, Elockid, Fluffernutter, Foxj, GB fan, HJ Mitchell, Julia W, Keegan, Lankiveil, MBisanz, Mentifisto, Mike V, Ponyo, Richwales, Snowolf, Someguy1221: Could you oversight all the edits made by this sock of User:Cow cleaner 5000? KATMAKROFAN (talk) 00:14, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I also asked above for the user 'tribs be nuked. - Mlpearc (open channel) 00:19, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see how the edits meet oversight or revdel criterion. -- GB fan 00:46, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

+1 The reason for oversight are not obvious here. Daniel Case (talk) 02:32, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanx to whoever did the nuke :) - Mlpearc (open channel) 00:51, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@KATMAKROFAN: We don't suppress revisions just because an account is a sockpuppet. Unless any of the edits fall under the criteria listed at Wikipedia:Oversight#Policy, and from the ones I've looked at they don't, the oversighters cannot take action. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 04:20, 8 October 2016 (UTC).[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Knowledgekid666. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]