User talk:KnowitallWiki

Thanks for experimenting with the page User:Francs2000 on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --Nlu (talk) 05:45, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Improving dead mall list

I've started a topic on the talk page for List of dead and distressed shopping malls about how to continue to improve the article, now that it's survived an AfD. Hope you'll join in. SchuminWeb (Talk) 03:01, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello KnowitallWiki. One of your recent edits was undone by an automated bot as likely abuse of editing privileges. Our welcome page provides information for new users who would like to contribute. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you feel you have recieved this notice in error, please contact the bot owner. Thank you for your interest in our project. // Tawkerbot2 20:26, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

opinion

fan opinions can not be sourced unless they've been documented by a credible source. Message forums are not considered credible sources by wikipedia. --Crossmr 01:37, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove legitimate warnings from your talk page or replace them with inappropriate content. Removing or maliciously altering warnings from your talk page will not remove them from the page history. You're welcome to archive your talk page, but be sure to provide a link to any deleted legitimate comments. If you continue to remove or vandalize legitimate warnings from your talk page, you will lose your privilege of editing your talk page. Thanks. --Gray Porpois e^{Phocoenidae, not Delphinidae} 22:10, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Letting you know what you did wrong"

Mess with me :P

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. One or more of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Nintendo Spam, have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Netkinetic (t/c/@) 21:50, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Nintendo Spam page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. — Scientizzle 21:51, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not trying to sound sarcastic, but...

2004 came before 2005, not after it.
The DS came out in 2004. The Game Boy micro came out in 2005. As such, there's no possibility the micro's succssor could be the DS.
If you feel that you must put something in the successor field, then the Game Boy Advance SP mark ii (I don't know if that's the official name, or just what people are calling it. It's the one with the updated backlight) followed the micro, specifically to incorporate the primary benefit of the micro with the existing SP model. But the DS is not a successor of the micro. I explained that pretty clearly in the edit summary and in a new section in the micro article's talk page. Reverting good-faith edits without a shred of discussion isn't very polite. Bladestorm 14:17, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disney catch

Thanks for catching that! Banje boi 02:17, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thank you. Special-T (talk) 21:38, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Independence Day!

As you are a nice Wikipedian, I just wanted to wish you a happy Independence Day! And if you are not an American, then have a happy day and a wonderful weekend anyway! :) Your friend and colleague, --Happy Independence Day! Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 00:40, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fuckparade nn?

Did you even read the previous votes before you made that outlandish, wholly unresearched claim? --32.134.59.40 (talk) 05:25, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chronology of Star Wars

Hello You previously voted on a deletion debation for this article some time ago. The result of that AFD was no consensus, and the article had now been re-nominated for deletion. Just drawing your attention to this fact, should you consider to join in the debate again. Thanks, Dalejenkins | 16:57, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordan Angeli

Hello,

I was wondering if you think any college player can ever be notable? To me it seems rather ridiculous that the very best college players in any given sport aren't, in reality, considerably more notable than someone who meets the bare minimum of "1 minute in one professional game."

The women in this AfD all all among the very best college players, and I have taken the time to show they have all been covered in depth by reliable sources. Thus, I respectfully request you reconsider your !vote - that is, unless you feel no current college player could possible be notable for their athletic accomplishments.

Thank you, --ThaddeusB (talk) 14:16, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Laganaphyllis Simnovorii" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Laganaphyllis Simnovorii and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 25#Laganaphyllis Simnovorii until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 00:15, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]