User talk:Knights who say ni

DYK

On 4 November, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article harpoon reaction, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--Allen3 ^talk 11:34, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Collision theory

Nice job on adding material to the collision theory page. Later: --Sadi Carnot 18:35, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: energy profile image

Hi there, I've created a new version of Image:Activation2.svg, and posted it on Talk:Enzyme. Any thoughts? Thanks, Fvasconcellos 19:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, and thanks for the input. Fvasconcellos 20:27, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Great username

What more can I say? - Jmabel | Talk 05:53, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Acids with Data Pages?

(I'm not a chemist so I am probably not using the correct terminology. Sorry.)

I need a second opinion on something. Some acids have data pages which include data for their constituent compound. Like this:

Hydrochloric acid (data page) note the properties that gaseous hydrochloric acid has!

Isn't that bad? Shouldn't that data be deleted and moved to the hydrogen chloride (data page)? And if so, should an acid even have a data page?

Again, I'm not really a chemist, so if this is a really stupid question, please let me know.

Thanks, Jasonbrotherton 07:10, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Surface tension

Greetings. I am trying to shape up the surface tension article so that it can get a GA rating. Please look at the bottom of the talk page for that article to see what the remaining issues are. As the author of the thermodynamics section, I was hoping you could provide references for the Gibbs free energy (gamma = partial of G with respect to A), entropy per unit area, and enthalpy per unit area. Although I have no trouble deriving these from my own knowledge of thermo, doing so is in the article is not appropriate. These equations need references to a text or journal. Also needed are references for Eötvös and Guggenheim-Katayama. Karl Hahn (T) (C) 04:50, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good to hear from you again. I found references for all the equations except the entropy per unit area equation. I started with my old pchem text and found much of the stuff in the thermo section. But I there were still some that weren't in there. Then I remembered that 30 years ago when I interned for two summers at an industrial chem lab, I grabbed up a stack of books that were in a throw-away pile, and I recalled there was one on surfaces. I checked my bookcase, and sure enough -- it was still there. Anyway, if you can find a ref for the entropy equation, please enter it. I am still going to be doing a little more rework on the article -- rewriting the lead and adding an intro paragraph to the section on measurement. The re-review is scheduled for this weekend. Karl Hahn (T) (C) 01:37, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Salamanca

You do a lot a work? .... i did that page, i put'd the images,. but so.. i changed that page not is for erase your contributions, is cause that is more atractive the article like that. Cheers --Venerock (talk) 23:06, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Missing chemistry topics

Could you by any chance have a look at this. I am not sure how many of the topics would only require a redirect or something similar - Skysmith (talk) 10:52, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Knights who say ni/sandbox2

User:Knights who say ni/sandbox2, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Knights who say ni/sandbox2 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Knights who say ni/sandbox2 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. j⚛e decker ^talk 21:24, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Consecutive reactions rate constants 1-2.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Consecutive reactions rate constants 1-2.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 03:47, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Consecutive reactions rate constants 1-10.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:09, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Consecutive reactions rate constants 2-1.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:08, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Knights who say ni. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Adsorption Isotherms (Langmuir red & BET green.JPG

The file File:Adsorption Isotherms (Langmuir red & BET green.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned free-use image with no obvious encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. fuzzy510 (talk) 08:45, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]