User talk:Knight Whitefire

References

Look, I am not getting into an edit war with you. However, everything that is likely to be challenged must be properly sourced. The sentence "...has been confirmed as the...", how can you say this if you are not showing the source that confirms it? In future please stop removing citation needed tags, unless you are actually going to put a reference in. Furthermore, you should not delete the contents of you talk page, they should be archived instead. Nouse4aname (talk) 08:52, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OWN

Edit summaries such as this "Fixed minor things and will finish cleaning up Wowzers12345 edits tomarrow but until then can someone go around and edit their grammer and pic edits." are not appropriate and give the impression that you are claiming "ownership" of the article. Please be more careful in future. Nouse4aname (talk) 11:04, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, the edits you reverted in fact went against the style guidlines for date formats. Check out Wikipedia:MOS#Dates. For example. dates such as January 17th are written as January 17. Nouse4aname (talk) 11:12, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty. Odd.

Hi. I see you recently copied and pasted the content back to Pretty. Odd. because someone moved the page. This method of moving pages does work, however, it does not move the history of the page and could therefore cause problems. It left the old history of Pretty. Odd. back at Preety Odd. There's nothing that can be done about it now, but in the future, when trying to move a page over a page that already exists, please put a speedy deletion template on the page you're trying to move to (assuming it's blank or a redirect) and wait until an admin deletes that page so you can move the page to that name. Thank you. Tim meh ! 00:50, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lennon needs references

We are trying to get John Lennon to GA standard, and if you know the process, you will know that it's not f'+*ing easy. GA articles are hard to come by, and we think John deserves one. If you want to complain about ^{[citation needed]}, then add some citations. We would all be happy about that, would we not? (I wrote this in a friendly way, and I wish you the best. You can help as well.) --andreasegde (talk) 20:14, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Mad as Rabbits. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Closedmouth (talk) 12:37, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]