User talk:Kmzundel

Archives

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Your hard work here is very much appreciated! Kimmikoko (talk) 15:27, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

John Fullbright

I've asked for some input at WP:BLPN about the article. You can join the discussiun here Best, -- — Keithbob • Talk • 14:16, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Griffin House performing at the 2013 Woody Guthrie Folk Festival.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Griffin House performing at the 2013 Woody Guthrie Folk Festival.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:37, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Removing a redundant file is fine with me. Kmzundel (talk) 22:51, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Mark Erelli - Hi Res - 2009.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Mark Erelli - Hi Res - 2009.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:48, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Removing a redundant file is fine with me. Kmzundel (talk) 17:50, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library needs you!

The Wikipedia Library

Call for Volunteers

Did you know that Wikipedia has its own library? The Wikipedia Library is seeking volunteers from those in galleries, libraries, archives and museums.

Become an account coordinator to distribute research accounts to editors
Get involved in some of our special projects:
- Expand our Resources page with free resources for editors in all subject areas
- Help develop a template for citing archival collections
- Write guides to accessing and using library resources

Sign up to help here :)

Delivered on behalf of The Wikipedia Library by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:18, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Kmzundel. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

About Third Opinion

Hello, Kmzundel. You have new messages at Trooper1005's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Some stroopwafels for you!

Barnes & Noble Starbucks has this Dutch treat for you. Cheers! Dthomsen8 (talk) 15:56, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello from a librarian

Dthomsen8 asked me to get in touch with you. Feel free to contact me if you need anything. Dorevabelfiore (talk) 16:04, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I am trying to resolve a dispute regarding the Ellis Paul article and am hoping you will lend support on the Talk:Ellis Paul page by offering a Third Party Opinion. In a nutshell, another editor removed a sound sample box that has been part of the article for 10 years. I would like to have a consensus to be able to add the sound sample back. The other editor said it was "excessive use" although I have been unable to find any guideline regarding that. The sound sample was used because the article noted that the song was the theme song in a major motion picture. To me, that was "commentary" enough to have included the sound sample despite was user Hoary said. Kmzundel (talk) 01:25, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello from another person

Ibid. Also, if you want to ask questions or get feedback about things you're working on, there will be a WikiSalon (open meetup) this Saturday at the Chemical Heritage Foundation, 315 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia from 1-3 p.m. I'll be there, and so may others. Everyone is welcome, whatever they wish to edit. Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 19:59, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the invitation, but I am traveling to Massachusetts this weekend. I am trying to resolve a dispute regarding the Ellis Paul article and am hoping you will lend support on the Talk:Ellis Paul page by offering a Third Party Opinion. In a nutshell, another editor removed a sound sample box that has been part of the article for 10 years. I would like to have a consensus to be able to add the sound sample back. The other editor said it was "excessive use" although I have been unable to find any guideline regarding that. The sound sample was used because the article noted that the song was the theme song in a major motion picture. To me, that was "commentary" enough to have included the sound sample despite was user Hoary said. Kmzundel (talk) 01:27, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disclosure

Per Wikipedia policy WP:PAID, I am disclosing that I am being compensated by the Taylor Music Company to bring the Livingston Taylor article into compliance. Kmzundel (talk) 14:57, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Kmzundel. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Livingston Taylor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ben Taylor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Kmzundel. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ellis Paul Featured article review

I have nominated Ellis Paul for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:02, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

====Sandy, I haven't logged into Wikipedia for months and am just seeing this today. :-( I am really bummed that the Ellis Paul article was delisted. Naturally with the pandemic, his touring life came to a standstill. He is just starting to tour regularly again and has a new album coming out which would have been newsworthy. --Kmzundel (talk) 19:40, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]