User talk:Kmorozov/Archive1

Marie-Louise O'Murphy

That was fast! :) Vincent 08:38, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

New Russia-related articles

Hello, colleague. Please don't forget to announce your new Russia-related articles here. Thanks. --Ghirlandajo 07:44, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Medieval articles

Hi, I notice you are creating a lot of medieval-related articles, so you might be interested in the Middle Ages WikiProject. You might also want to list any new articles you create at Wikipedia:WikiProject Middle Ages/New Articles. Adam Bishop 06:57, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Male Wikipedians

Hi! I noticed you made yourself a male userbox. I've just made a "standard" one at {{User:MiraLuka/Userboxes/User male}} (which slots you into Category:Male Wikipedians). Feel free to use it and/or edit it! — Asbestos | Talk (RFC) 19:07, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Family and children

Thank you for adding these lists to various mideval Habsburg biographies. I hope you continue with others because it is a valuable addition. --StanZegel (talk) 13:41, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Meissen/Meißen + other points

Regarding the article Henry III, Markgraf of Meißen, and the others you are putting up regarding German ruling houses, I have some comments to make, which I hope you will take as helpful.

Firstly, the German letter ß does not exist in English and to most English speakers is not comprehensible. The English form of Meißen is Meissen. It avoids a lot of problems (and cleaning up) if when dealing with German language items you substitute for the ß a double ss - which is not wrong in German either. Secondly, if you are translating from the German Wikipedia please say so, as otherwise your articles will be tagged for lacking sources. Thirdly, please be consistent with titles such as Burggraf/Burgrave and Markgraf /Margrave. Doubtless a case can be made for using either form - but you should decide which you want and then stick to it - again, this will avoid unnecessary copyediting after the event. Best, Staffelde 14:57, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

As an addition to that, maybe you should just stop translating articles from German. I don't know what you are doing, but they sound like they have been put through Babelfish, and they end up making absolutely no sense. We'd almost be better off with no articles at all. Adam Bishop 20:58, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary

Hello. Please remember to always provide an edit summary. Thanks and happy editing. JoaoRicardo^talk 14:18, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Alex Bakharev

Take a look. It seems there that the raging russophobia of some is the only reason of the attempts to derail the candidacy of one of the most worthy people for the job. His unquestionably high ethics and decensy are so clear even from how he handles the criticism and shameless attacks at his own RfAdm even for those who don't know him his contributions to Wikipedia. The voting is almost over. If you want to vote on the issue, please vote now, --Irpen 22:33, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Saint Petersburg Governorate

Hi, K! Wanted to drop a quick note to express my gratitude for creation of this article. I see it's still in progress, but—nice job! Also, I wonder if you know the answer to the question I've been trying to have answered for quite a while now. According to numerous sources, Ingermanland Governorate was renamed St. Petersburg Governorate in 1710. I, however, am having a helluva time trying to find an exact date. I was able to find that Peter the I issued an edict to that effect (and that a copy of that edict was at the time of St. Petersburg's 300th Anniversary on display in the Central Archive of Moscow), but the actual date still eludes me (and I do not have access to Russian libraries as I live in the States). Just curious if you happen to know it or if you can look it up somewhere without going into too much trouble. If you could help, I'd greatly appreciate it, if not, it's alright, too.—Ëzhiki (ërinacëus amurënsis) 13:29, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for adding this information. May I ask where you found it, please? Also, is the date of June 3 Julian or Gregorian? Thank you again.—Ëzhiki (ërinacëus amurënsis) 14:08, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[1], Comment 106 Kmorozov 14:11, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Olszyna-Wilczyński

Hi there! You might want to know that there is a question for you at Talk:Józef_Olszyna-Wilczyński#Source. Cheers! Halibu tt 00:53, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Did you know? has been updated. A fact from the article Anna Petrovna, which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Did you know? has been updated. A fact from the article Andrey Matveyev, which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Image:Galereja_1812.jpg

Are you sure that the image was taken and published before 1973? Please clear up your source. Happy edits, Ghirla | talk 15:06, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image replaced Kmorozov 07:17, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Listmania

What's the point of starting articles like this? Do you think they are helpful for anyone? --Ghirla | talk 17:46, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry, they are (at least to me). I use lists a lot. Halibu tt 17:55, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Military Gallery

Isn't it time to stop downloading new images for the gallery? Wikipedia is not an image repository. --Ghirla | talk 10:40, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I added only 2 of 12 pictures, and last only to round it off Kmorozov 10:44, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's OK with me but we should be cautious after the Gallery of Socialist Realism was deleted. --Ghirla | talk 11:02, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lenin Peace Prize

Any particular reason why you restored the Russian interwiki link? The Russian entry deals with both the (national) Stalin Prize/Lenin Prize and the International Lenin Peace Prize, so it is not the same lemma. — ^PDD 19:29, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oettingen

I see you write a lot about the Wittelsbachs. In this case, you may be interested to check an extensive genealogy of the related House of Oettingen. Cheers, Ghirla | talk 14:18, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And while we are still on this topic, you may be interested to check www.genealogics.org, a brilliant website by my friend Leo van der Pas, with nice bios of European nobility and royalty. --Ghirla | talk 20:59, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Did you know? has been updated. A fact from the article Military Gallery, which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Did you know? has been updated. A fact from the article Nikolay Raevsky, which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Rulers' names

Dear Kmorozov, I have seen that you have edited Rulers of Hesse in the past, so I am asking you about your opinions:

Should rulers' names be given in their English or in their German form?
What should be done about articles that have been created with the non-preferred spelling/form in their title?

Thanks for your consideration. Str1977 19:16, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Romanovs coa.jpg

Do you really think that 16th-century Muscovite boyars used coats of arms? Isn't it an anachronism? --Ghirla | talk 13:21, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See [2] Kmorozov 13:23, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Football AID 12 February - 18 February

Thank you for participating in the Football AID vote this week.

FC Dynamo Kyiv has been selected as this week's collaboration. Please do help in working to improve it.

DYK

Did you know? has been updated. A fact from the article Dashi-Dorzho Itigelov, which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--Gurubrahma 00:06, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your voting!

Hi, thanks for your voting on my RFA. It has finished with the result 88/14/9, and I am promoted. I am really overwhelmed with the amount of support I have got. With some of you we have edited many articles as a team, with some I had bitter arguments in the past, some of you I consider to be living legends of Wikipedia and some nicks I in my ignorance never heard before. I love you all and I am really grateful to you.

If you feel I can help you or Wikipedia as a human, as an editor or with my newly acquired cleaning tools, then just ask and I will be happy to assist. If you will feel that I do not live up to your expectation and renegade on my promises, please contact me. Maybe it was not a malice but just ignorance or a short temper. Thank you very much, once more! abakharev 07:34, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request for edit summary

Hi. I am a bot, and I am writing to you with a request. I would like to ask you, if possible, to use edit summaries a bit more often when you contribute. The reason an edit summary is important is because it allows your fellow contributors to understand what you changed; you can think of it as the "Subject:" line in an email. For your information, your current edit summary usage is 35% for major edits and 20% for minor edits. (Based on the last 150 major and 150 minor edits in the article namespace.)

This is just a suggestion, and I hope that I did not appear impolite. You do not need to reply to this message, but if you would like to give me feedback, you can do so at the feedback page. Thank you, and happy edits, Mathbot 09:00, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright

Hello, why do you think that this image is in public domain? Are sure that its author died before 1906? --Ghirla ^-трёп- 17:55, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Did you know? has been updated. A fact from the article Anna of Kashin, which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--Gurubrahma 03:33, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Standard Yoruba

That was fast! (Re: your adding a category to Standard Yoruba). I always have to go back to articles I just created to add the categories. Thanks for fixing! — mark ✎ 13:08, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Allow me

I, Alex Bakharev, award you the Epic barnstar for your fine articles devoted to the History of Russia, particularly Anna of Kashin and List of Russian commanders in the Patriotic War of 1812, 14:00, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

Saint Petersburg Governorate

Hi! Did you have any particular reasons for making this edit, or was it just a glitch? Thanks.—Ëzhiki (ërinacëus amurënsis) 17:54, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Restored, a glitch Kmorozov 05:53, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your articles on the early "Earls of Warwick"

Where did you get your information? I am researching the Greville line (lords of the several manors in Warwickshire in the 13-18th centurie) The title of the book I am using

"Edmondson, Joseph. An historical and genealogical account of the noble family of Greville, to the time of Francis, the present Earl Brooke, and Earl of Warwick including the history and succession of the several Earls of Warwick since the Norman Conquest; and some account of Warwick Castle.. London, 1766."

states that the early Earls claim the last name of de Newburgh. You have gone from Beaumont to Beauchamp. The latter is correct but not sure where you found the former.

Feedback,

Thanks, Lisa --

See here www.beaumontfamily.com/Downloads/BIHallchaps.pdf Kmorozov 06:05, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sabine of Bavaria-Munich

I added your article to the announcement section of the Germany portal. If you create more articles about German nobility, please add them there. Thank you, and happy editing! Kusma (討論) 01:09, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I gave your article a quick proof-read. Nice job. But I noticed that you changed her name from Sabina to Sabine. I moved it to her correct name (see for that the German article and also the site you quoted as refrence). --Mmounties (Talk)

06:30, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Catholic Encyclopedia Totals

On Wikipedia:Catholic Encyclopedia topics, you "[restored correct counts]" that did not count the "Blue links" sections on the "B" and "M" pages. I think that they should be counted, though, since the blue links section is still work to be done. Ardric47 06:10, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

When uploading this photograph, you wrote: "This image is in the public domain because its copyright has expired in the United States and those countries with a copyright term of life of the author plus 100 years or less". Do you really think that the photo was taken more than a century ago?? --Ghirla ^-трёп- 08:14, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Princes of Russia

Can you tell me who is the major editor of Russian rulers,or the list of them,in English wikipedia?Thanks very much.--Douglasfrankfort 03:41, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Did you know? has been updated. A fact from the article Slavonic translations of the Bible, which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Did you know? has been updated. A fact from the article Ostrog Bible, which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

corrections

Thanks for your corrections to Arcady Boytler. Do you know how to put his name and the film titles in the cyrillic alphabet?--Rockero 00:26, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit of my user space

Please, in the future, advise me on any proposals you have regarding anything you might see in my own user space. I consider the editing of my work without prior discussion to be rude. Your suggestion that I desired to "advertise" my "experiments" is in error. However, commenting out the categories was a reasonable edit and one which I agree with. --Mal 09:07, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Did you know? has been updated. A fact from the article Losiny Ostrov National Park, which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Did you know? has been updated. A fact from the article Fersman Mineralogical Museum, which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--Cactus.man ✍ 16:42, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for organizing the paragraphs well in the History of wound care article. :) Also, I would not be offended if you edited my user page :P -- Mac Davis] ⌇☢ ญƛ. 09:28, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Easter greetings

Khristos voskrese! --Ghirla ^-трёп- 14:37, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Survey on the use of Latinized/Greek names for Byzantine rulers

Hi. There is a survey on the names of Byzantine rulers at Talk:Constantine XI. Maybe you are interested in.--Panairjdde 17:53, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Survey on the use of Latinized/Greek names for Byzantine rulers Follow Up

Greetings. As a recent contributor to the survey on the names of Byzantine rulers at Talk:Constantine XI, you may be interested in the following. A mediation sought by Panairjdde resulted in the recommendation that "that proposal two from this page be implemented in the short term, until a consensus can be reached about proposal three". Accordingly, before resuming the editorial process, I am seeking feedback on whether option 2 or 3 of the former survey is more acceptable. Please state (or re-state) your opinion in the follow up survey on Talk:Constantine XI. Thank you for your time, Imladjov 14:47, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ancestry of Nicholas II of Russia

Please see the new comments on the talk page as to why the format is totally unworkable or change the name of the page to Genealogy of the Russian Imperial Family. The name is misleading as ancestry implies a readable format in which descent can easily be traced. The house divisions are in extensive need of review. I and others will help if needed. Sorry about the tone I took earlier. Charles 16:44, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Genealogy of the Russian Imperial Family? It is too complex and implies including of the ancestry of all other members, derived from other Emperors. If the name is misleading we need change it, but "Ancestry of Nicholas II of Russia" is equal to "List of ancestors of some particular person, namely Nicholas II of Russia" and reflect the content of this article. Also, see User:Kmorozov/Test. Kmorozov 06:22, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What's the deal with Genealogy_of_the_British_Royal_Family then? The article "on Nicholas II" involves an Emperor who inherited father to son over many generations, so the ancesrty covers not only the ancestors of Nicholas II, but the previous Emperors of Russia. Charles 16:27, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Serdtse

Ogromnoe spasibo for improving the Aquarium link in Serdtse! User_talk:Pan_Gerwazy--pgp 15:45, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Move request for emperors of the Palaeologus/Palaiologos dynasty

Hi. There is a move request for several Palaeologus/Palaiologos dynasty emperors at Talk:List of Byzantine Emperors. I tought you might be interested in.--Panairjdde 22:18, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

War and Peace question

Hello Kmorozov. I first want to say that I like the change that you made to the Russian film version of War and Peace's wikipage. In reading it a question came to mind. The first paragraph states that it took seven years to produce - then your additions show that part 4 was released in 1966 - which might mean that production started in 1959. Now, having lived through the "Lord of the Rings" experience I can understand that such an epic project like this film might have needed several years of preproduction before principal filming got underway. What I am wondering is whether you have any info on when planning started, when filming actually started and when it might have finished? If you do have any of this info do you think that it is worth adding to the article? From the look of things you are a busy Wikipedian so please don't feel the need to rush a reply to my query but if, and when, you have the time anything you can add to my knowledge of this unique film will be much appreciated.User:MarnetteD | Talk 15:22, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Today's featured article

Just wanted to let you know a featured article you worked on, 0.999..., was featured today on the Main Page. Tobacman 00:28, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Commons

Please consider uploading your images to Wikimedia Commons, from where they will be available in Russian wikipedia, German wikipedia, and fellow projects. By the way, this image seems to represent the Old English Embassy, no? --Ghirla ^-трёп- 10:36, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. No, the Embassy located in a court yard of the Romanov's house, below the Varvarka street. Moreover, on the wall of this building is placed a memorial board about what is it. Kmorozov 10:42, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anna of Kashin

Is there a way you can put in information from your Anna of Kashin article into the Kashin article? The Kashin article is currently a mess. By the way, is your name Kirill? --Ineffable3000 16:39, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Google don't knows all, i'm not Kirill :) Kmorozov 16:32, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]