Jump to content

User talk:Kmartigue

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:32, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm NinjaRobotPirate. I noticed that you recently removed content from Joe Egender without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:32, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Please don't blank sourced content. Having this much commentary might be a little excessive, but you removed a lot of citations, leaving some of the statements unsourced. If you think specific sources should be removed, please raise the issue on the article's talk page. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:36, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi thanks for your reply. The reason for the removal is that all the reviews are unnecessary. Why inject reviews of each performance into what should be a factual summary of Joe Egender's film work? The TV section in this wiki page doesn't do this. Most actor's wiki pages don't have reviews quoted for each performance. Look at Elizabeth Olsen's page for an example. The reviews are distracting and cluttering and I believe show some bias. Agree? Thanks.