User talk:Kmanahan1221

I appreciate the structure of this article: it follows a similar pattern to what a CMP would actually look like. It’s very easy to follow as a result. It’s well-researched, as the citations show, but could stand to have a few interlinks to further define terms – your mention of NAGPRA, for example, would be a great place to link to another article. The voice is authoritative, but tends a little bit towards bias with the frequent use of “should” – museums “should” include these various items in their CMPs, but why? Justifying these claims would eliminate any bias. Overall, the article is clear, with well-defined terms that speak to people who are unfamiliar with the museum world. It’s a little grammatically uneven, but still easy to read. Good work!

MuseeDesReves (talk) 16:13, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Gross Clinic Pre-Conservation.jpeg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Gross Clinic Pre-Conservation.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Majora (talk) 20:44, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]