User talk:Klynchk

Image:Piccy005356.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Piccy005356.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 17:04, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The focus is a secondary reason. The primary reason I nominated the image for deletion is that the image is not linked to any article. Orphan images are routinely deleted as Wikipedia is not an image hosting service by policy. Please place the image in an appropriate article and I will be happy to withdraw the nomination. -Regards Nv8200p talk 23:34, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm deleting Image:Piccy005356.JPG because it is a duplicate of Image:Kl 0005356.jpg on the Commons. -Nv8200p talk 02:03, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the Speleothem#Gallery to link to the image Image:Kl 0005356.jpg on the Commons as part of the deletion process for Image:Piccy005356.JPG, so the article looks the same. -Nv8200p talk 00:28, 1 March 2007 (UTC) Oops. Scratch that. The page was already linked to Image:Kl 0005356.jpg so the page was not changed or affected. -Regards Nv8200p talk 00:36, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

LarryThanks for that - I was not able to figure out how to delete it when I first uploaded it. Klynchk 10:52, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Moonshell notability

Reinstated Moonshell notability tag. This is not an edit war. 13 days later, nothing's been done to establish notability. Please read WP:N#Notability_is_not_subjective. This article is not under threat of deletion anytime soon. The notability tag is primarily URGENT ADVICE for IMPROVING the article, and yes, it's a bit of a spine-tingler. I have no opinion for or against the subject of the article. --Lexein 01:36, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back. Trouble is, I can't find any books or printed magazines, or gaming or multimedia websites which aren't blogs writing something beefy about Moonshell. I found two websites which have sort-of half-done real reviews. --Lexein 19:28, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've replied to your q in Talk:Moonshell - in future, poke me at my Talk page. Sorry for the delay. --Lexein 22:41, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Backlight Bleeding (June 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Klynchk/Backlight Bleeding and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Klynchk/Backlight Bleeding, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 21:22, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Klynchk! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eagleash (talk) 21:22, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Klynchk/Backlight Bleeding

Hello, Klynchk. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Backlight Bleeding".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:21, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]