User talk:KlubKelli

Hello, KlubKelli! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! MBisanzBot (talk) 15:40, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Placeholder account 04:03, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Harmony Rose

Citing your own fan page of hers is shaky as it borders on self-published original research. How did you learn about some of the statements your fan page asserts? If you read it from somewhere, you should cite to those sources instead. Morbidthoughts (talk) 03:40, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly in some cases I have to contact movie companies directly or sometimes the starlet. I also use the booking agents and mangers as sources of data. I also use data I find on their personal websites or myspace pages or through interviews done at trade shows like the adult entertainment expo, as I have attended many having been in the business since 1996. I speak frequently with reps from all the major studios including Vivid and Digital Playground just to name a few. Some of the information I also get from talking with other porn stars. In this case (Hamony Rose), her best friend and old roommate, Tory Lane. I assure you there is no other single source information regarding this starlet than those I have listed.

For example the statement "Rose began her career as porn star in 2004 with her work on the movie New Nymphos" I got directly from speaking with Harmony Rose at a show years ago. She told me her first movie was New Nymphos and went on in the course of our conversation to discuss how it was on the set of her first movie. None of that was really relevant for Wikipedia so I just listed the fact that this was her first movie. KlubKelli talk) 04:30, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Madelyn Marie

The article Madelyn Marie has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:PORNBIO, no indication the subject can satisfy the GNG or any other specialized guideline, promotionally written

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 19:32, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Madelyn Marie

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Madelyn Marie. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madelyn Marie. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:06, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Meggan Mallone for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Meggan Mallone is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meggan Mallone until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spartaz ^Humbug! 22:49, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

COI edits

Hello, KlubKelli. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Looking at the history of your edits, you appear to have a COI in many of them. Please do declare them. Equine-man (talk) 17:41, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tawny Roberts for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tawny Roberts, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tawny Roberts until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]